RadioFreeLiberal.com

I have finally figured it out.

In an effort to end and destroy the GOP about 3 years ago the DNC came up with the following plan.

1] Nominate a person the public just doesn't like on a personal level

2] Make their internet servers so porous that the Russians could easily hack them.

3] Plant items on that to help the least qualified GOP candidate win the nomination.

4] Have an elderly Socialist who isn't a member of the party mount a credible challenge to your unpopular hand picked candidate. Then torpedo his campaign with underhanded tactics. Thus pissing off enough voters to get the most unqualified person alive today elected President.

5] Sit back and watch that person splinter and destroy the GOP from within.

6] After the GOP is destroyed swoop in and pick up the pieces. Taking total control over the Gov't for the next 2-3 decades.

Yep you Democrats are indeed a sneaky lot. But, fortunately I have figured out and destroyed your plot. Leaving you to quote that long time Democrat Snidley Whiplash " curses foiled again".

_________________
"my choice is for people like you to be deported -Ike Bana 5/13/18

"within weeks of being rid of the likes of you, rid of every fucking one of you,we would begin to see what kind of country this ought to be" Ike Bana 6/14/18

Have you been hitting the sauce again?

lol I'm guessing mescaline.

_________________
“On the whole human beings want to be good, but not too good, and not quite all the time.” –George Orwell

Uh-huh.

Right.

_________________

---

Stop calling the cops on us.

---

Well ... I know this scenario is just a mind bender, but still.

1) Hillary Clinton's popularity around 2011 was 60% favorable, 40% unfavorable. And yes, that was after the 2008 primary she lost. It's weird how soon people forget this, but she used to be very popular and Time Magazine featured her as one of the most admired women in America. It's weird, but her popularity always sinks during an election. Can you think of why? Two reasons come to mind for me.
2) I personally think while DWS was not as neutral as she should have been during the primaries - but you could expect that, she was close friends with HRC - Bernie was not "sabotaged" with underhanded tactics. Although I think part of the Russian stratagem was to get people to believe that, thus undermining confidence in our system.

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

Move over Steph Miller there is a new political satire sheriff in town.

_________________
"my choice is for people like you to be deported -Ike Bana 5/13/18

"within weeks of being rid of the likes of you, rid of every fucking one of you,we would begin to see what kind of country this ought to be" Ike Bana 6/14/18

Needs more cowbell.

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

You give them too much credit. Me thinks they really believed Clinton was the best choice and the most qualified and that everyone loved her.

_________________
Lest we forget

Obviously not "everyone" loved her. Republicans hated her, ever since the 90s when she said she wouldn't stay home and bake cookies.

It's weird. You would think, sometimes, though, she was the most hated woman in America.

Gallup: Hillary Clinton Is America’s Most-Admired Woman for Record 20th Time
http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/cnsnewscom- ... -20th-time

And that was in 2015 ... not ancient history.

I just always thought it was weird that in 2016 they mentioned how unpopular both her and Donald were ... however, Donald has never been a popular public figure, whereas at various points she was. Weird thing, she's always popular until she starts running for something. Then, people notice she's both ambitious and a woman, and the smear machine starts up again. (The two reasons).

Just another of those lame stream media overlooks, I suppose.

BTW, 16 million Democratic primary voters voted for her - of the D primary vote, she got 55% to Sanders' 43%, a 12 point gap. Bernie was not "cheated" out of winning the primaries. He lost fair and square, and don't take my word for it - he said so. So all this stuff about superdelegates cheating, DWS & DNC cheating - she still was a choice of a definite majority of D primary voters.

That might be a moment for people to hate on the party again, including its registered voters, but it is, what it is. Obviously, enough liked her (if not loved her) for her to get the nomination. My guess is, and I don't find this a wrong way of thinking, party voters like people who have been with the party and help other party members get elected more than people who suddenly join the party just to get a nomination.

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

There is truth to this. My 83 yr. old mother thinks Clinton lost because she's a woman. She said Look at all the old farts in the republican senate. You think they want a woman telling them the way it's gonna be? Old men vote. One good thing, my 87 yr. old dad voted for her.

_________________
Lest we forget