First Clarence Thomas and now...

News and events of the day
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:36 pm Except the Republicans don’t run everything. Last I checked, the Dems control the Senate and the Oval Office. You musta forgot about that.
Hmmm, where do the articles of impeachment come from?

Check your Constitution.
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:39 pm Hmmm, where do the articles of impeachment come from?

Check your Constitution.
Hmmm, the Senate also has oversight committees.

Check YOUR Constitution.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:42 pm Hmmm, the Senate also has oversight committees.

Check YOUR Constitution.
Doesn’t mean shit, they can’t file articles of impeachment.

But you wouldn’t understand that, would you?
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:43 pm Doesn’t mean shit, they can’t file articles of impeachment.

But you wouldn’t understand that, would you?
So. The best disinfectant is sunshine. So get all of Willis dirty laundry out there. Get all of Clarence Thomas’s dirty laundry out there.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:46 pm So. The best disinfectant is sunshine. So get all of Willis dirty laundry out there. Get all of Clarence Thomas’s dirty laundry out there.
There is a hearing scheduled in the Willis case. I’d say it’s just more Trump bullshit, that’s never true or factual, but it will be heard.

Of course, the guy funding Clarence Thomas refuses to give any information to the Senate Investigation.

But that’s fine with you, this isn’t about Hunter Biden, right?
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:49 pm There is a hearing scheduled in the Willis case. I’d say it’s just more Trump bullshit, that’s never true or factual, but it will be heard.

Of course, the guy funding Clarence Thomas refuses to give any information to the Senate Investigation.

But that’s fine with you, this isn’t about Hunter Biden, right?
So refer him to the DOJ just like Hunter. Works for me.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:50 pm So refer him to the DOJ just like Hunter. Works for me.
Supreme Court will overturn any investigations. They are untouchable.
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 6:51 pm Supreme Court will overturn any investigations. They are untouchable.
No they are not. Co equal branch of government. Not to mention that all of these are answerable in one way or another to the people. But if you want to throw in the towel and give up when the going gets a little rough, that’s up to you.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:01 pm No they are not. Co equal branch of government. Not to mention that all of these are answerable in one way or another to the people. But if you want to throw in the towel and give up when the going gets a little rough, that’s up to you.
No, they aren’t. But hey, anything to defend the corrupt, right?
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:06 pm No, they aren’t. But hey, anything to defend the corrupt, right?
You are the guy who’s whining that we can’t investigate corruption. Sounds like you are defending corruption. But that’s what you always do. I’m always up for investigations. Get the facts out there in the light of day. Good for everybody.
Glennfs
Posts: 10300
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:54 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by Glennfs »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:06 pm No, they aren’t. But hey, anything to defend the corrupt, right?
You are doing a great job diverting this into a conversation about Thomas because you are scared shitless to talk about Willis obvious corruption.

You don't hire your unqualified boyfriend and pay him 675000 in tax payers money.
Even a person as partisan as you can see the corruption there.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

Glennfs wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:23 pm You are doing a great job diverting this into a conversation about Thomas because you are scared shitless to talk about Willis obvious corruption.

You don't hire your unqualified boyfriend and pay him 675000 in tax payers money.
Even a person as partisan as you can see the corruption there.
He does divert the conversation to Thomas and then whines cause the Dems aren’t up to the task of actually investigating Thomas. Excuse after excuse of why they can’t do this or can’t do that. So much for the “can do” party he keeps crowing about. Maybe they really can’t do “can do”.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:32 pm He does divert the conversation to Thomas and then whines cause the Dems aren’t up to the task of actually investigating Thomas. Excuse after excuse of why they can’t do this or can’t do that. So much for the “can do” party he keeps crowing about. Maybe they really can’t do “can do”.
What name is in the title of the thread? Clarence Thomas?

So much for your bullshit about diversion.
Glennfs
Posts: 10300
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:54 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by Glennfs »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:35 pm What name is in the title of the thread? Clarence Thomas?

So much for your bullshit about diversion.
You aren't talking about the obvious corruption of Willis. But have Thomas guilty over far less.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:35 pm What name is in the title of the thread? Clarence Thomas?

So much for your bullshit about diversion.
Glenns point is still valid. You don’t really want to discuss Willis although both the Willis case and the Thomas case are about corruption. One you are concerned about and the other you are not. That’s bullshit.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

Glennfs wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:38 pm You aren't talking about the obvious corruption of Willis. But have Thomas guilty over far less.
Far more. Millions of dollars in payoffs with Thomas.

If I won the lottery, could I start giving millions to the so-called "liberal" Justices, hoping that they will rule like I want them to, like supporting union rights, and abortion rights?

You could say I don't have any cases before the Court - but I certainly want certain outcomes, don't I?

Again, any other judge in America wouldn't be a judge, and might be in jail.

As for Willis, she'll have her day in court next month. Will YOU accept the judge's decision?
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:40 pm Glenns point is still valid. You don’t really want to discuss Willis although both the Willis case and the Thomas case are about corruption. One you are concerned about and the other you are not. That’s bullshit.
Bullshit yourself. Willis will have her day in court soon, and I'll accept the decision of the judge. Will you? Yes or no?
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:42 pm Bullshit yourself. Willis will have her day in court soon, and I'll accept the decision of the judge. Will you? Yes or no?
Yep. I usually do. I trust the process. It’s not always perfect. Nothing is.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:46 pm Yep. I usually do. I trust the process. It’s not always perfect. Nothing is.
Then you'll admit it was all bullshit just more Trump crap, right?
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:48 pm Then you'll admit it was all bullshit just more Trump crap, right?
Haven’t heard the decision. Unlike you I usually wait to hear the evidence or the facts. Thats how good decisions are made. You should try it sometime.
Glennfs
Posts: 10300
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:54 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by Glennfs »

gounion wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:48 pm Then you'll admit it was all bullshit just more Trump crap, right?
So if the judge says hiring your unqualified boyfriend and paying hom 675k isn't illegal you will say it wasn't corrupt?
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

JoeMemphis wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:59 pm Haven’t heard the decision. Unlike you I usually wait to hear the evidence or the facts. Thats how good decisions are made. You should try it sometime.
Oh? You certainly sound like Glenn in that you have prejudged Willis of corruption.
gounion
Posts: 17240
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by gounion »

Glennfs wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:20 pm So if the judge says hiring your unqualified boyfriend and paying hom 675k isn't illegal you will say it wasn't corrupt?
He's qualified. He's been a judge, he's been in practice for years. He's quite qualified, like the other two lawyers she's hired.

Nothing like Trump's lawyers, one of whom has never every tried a case before ANY court.
JoeMemphis
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by JoeMemphis »

gounion wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:07 am Oh? You certainly sound like Glenn in that you have prejudged Willis of corruption.
Not really. I just said she should explain herself. Same as Clarence. Do you know what investigation means. It means take your head out of your ass and ask some questions. You should try that.
Glennfs
Posts: 10300
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:54 pm

Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...

Post by Glennfs »

gounion wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:08 am He's qualified. He's been a judge, he's been in practice for years. He's quite qualified, like the other two lawyers she's hired.

Nothing like Trump's lawyers, one of whom has never every tried a case before ANY court.
So in your personal opinion is Hiring your unqualified boyfriend and paying him 686k in taxpayer funds corrupt or not?

Not whether or not it is legal
Your personal opinion
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Post Reply