OJ is a red herring. The issues in that trial had nothing to do with this Proud Boy fellow traveler running to somebody else's city and murdering two people in the heat of a protest against police brutality.sam lefthand wrote: ↑Fri Nov 19, 2021 3:06 pmI've not decided on his guilt of innocence either way as is my personal policy on cases like this.
So insofar as I'm concerned this verdict settles this issue. He is not guilty, and in my mind that's the American way.
When it was OJ it was the same way, he was found not guilty, and I accepted that.
Yet, your rightwing friends invoking OJ have spent the past 30 years seething under their collars about OJ.
So, careful how you play that "he's not guilty and I'm settled with it" card. The people currently throwing it do not feel that way about the same OJ trial they keep trying to tie this to, and are fanatically not-settled about OJ.
Well, it doesn't affect you, so of course you are are glad.I accept this verdict as the definition of what is not guilty.
I'm glad it is over.