Garland Presser on Jan 6th Insurrection

[Drak]

Garland:

"As we begin a new year and mark a solemn anniversary, we will do everything in our power to defend the American People and Democracy."

"Proceedings in both chambers were delayed for hours, obstructing the peaceful transfer of power."

"Those involved must be held accountable and there is no higher priority than for us at the DOJ."

"In the aftermath, the DoJ began its work on one of the largest investigations...in our nations history."

“In complex cases, initial charges are often less severe than later charges, and this is purposeful”

"We build investigations by laying a foundation. We resolve more straightforward cases first because they provide the evidentiary foundation for more complex cases."

“There can not be different rules for the powerful and the powerless. There is only one rule of law.”

[Drak]

Garland referenced Watergate, signaling who they're investigating.

[Libertas]

Garland referenced Watergate, signaling who they're investigating.

I am concerned about the comment about not one ideology is responsible.

But no biggie for now, sure hope they indict trump and soon.

Found it

dammit

"These acts and threats of violence are not associated with any one set of partisan or ideological views,"

Yes they are.

https://www.npr.org/2022/01/05/10706759 ... nniversary

But if you indict trump and the others, then this wont matter. Although having said this the right and the media will DEMAND you indict BLM or something as such that is not violent and irrelevant.

No independent counsel, Merrick? Clinton had one on him for a blowjob. But insurrection, nah.

[carmenjonze]

Yes they are.

Yes, they definitely are "associated with any one set of partisan or ideological views."

IDK why he said that, or who he thinks he is fooling.

These acts and threats of violence are coming from one corner and only one corner: conservative whites, and those people have a long history of this very thing. Except, they've never stormed the capitol of this country, not even during the Civil War, not even during their most violent acts of the Civil Rights era.

Like all white moderates, Garland can't be trusted. They are precisely the people who facilitate white-conservative violence.

[Libertas]

Yes, they definitely are "associated with any one set of partisan or ideological views."

IDK why he said that, or who he thinks he is fooling.

These acts and threats of violence are coming from one corner and only one corner: conservative whites, and those people have a long history of this very thing. Except, they've never stormed the capitol of this country, not even during the Civil War, not even during their most violent acts of the Civil Rights era.

Like all white moderates, Garland can't be trusted. They are precisely the people who facilitate white-conservative violence.

I dont trust him, I dont think they will do it.

I think they need an independent counsel. One was warranted to get to the bottom of a blowjob, why not this?

[Glennfs]

Yes, they definitely are "associated with any one set of partisan or ideological views."

IDK why he said that, or who he thinks he is fooling.

These acts and threats of violence are coming from one corner and only one corner: conservative whites, and those people have a long history of this very thing. Except, they've never stormed the capitol of this country, not even during the Civil War, not even during their most violent acts of the Civil Rights era.

Like all white moderates, Garland can't be trusted. They are precisely the people who facilitate white-conservative violence.

Now we add white moderates to the list of white people who can't be trusted.
Please tell what white people can be trusted and this is a real question

[carmenjonze]

troll