No one is more hypocritical than you. I don't lie about who I support.
First Clarence Thomas and now...
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
{CITATION NEEDED}
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-defenda ... =107117193
One thing for sure someone is definitely lying. Either the prosecution or the defense lawyers.
This is what happens when a county prosecutor steps out of their lane for personal and professional gains
One thing for sure someone is definitely lying. Either the prosecution or the defense lawyers.
This is what happens when a county prosecutor steps out of their lane for personal and professional gains
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
Could Donald Trump and his minions be lying?Glennfs wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 10:50 am https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-defenda ... =107117193
One thing for sure someone is definitely lying. Either the prosecution or the defense lawyers.
This is what happens when a county prosecutor steps out of their lane for personal and professional gains
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
They could be but in this instance I doubt it.
Because if Willis is innocent why is she doing the exact same Trump has done.
Trying to get the hearing canceled or postponed
Trying is squash supenas
Trying to keep bank records removed
Going to friendly sources and claiming her opponents are after her
Of course you would have the exact same opinion about a republican.....right
https://abcnews.go.com/US/fulton-county ... =107151886
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
I’ll wait foe the judge on this, because it’ll happen soon.Glennfs wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 3:20 pm They could be but in this instance I doubt it.
Because if Willis is innocent why is she doing the exact same Trump has done.
Trying to get the hearing canceled or postponed
Trying is squash supenas
Trying to keep bank records removed
Going to friendly sources and claiming her opponents are after her
Of course you would have the exact same opinion about a republican.....right
https://abcnews.go.com/US/fulton-county ... =107151886
And you believe Trump and not the women who say he assaulted them. Just lying bitches, right?
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
Glenn, they’re having hearings on this Thursday and Friday before the judge.
I’ll accept whatever the judge decides. But you won’t if they rule in Willis’ favor, will you? Because you ALWAYS believe what Trump says, and Willis is just another lying bitch, right?
I’ll accept whatever the judge decides. But you won’t if they rule in Willis’ favor, will you? Because you ALWAYS believe what Trump says, and Willis is just another lying bitch, right?
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
You refuse to give a personal opinion because she is a liberal democrat.gounion wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 4:01 pm Glenn, they’re having hearings on this Thursday and Friday before the judge.
I’ll accept whatever the judge decides. But you won’t if they rule in Willis’ favor, will you? Because you ALWAYS believe what Trump says, and Willis is just another lying bitch, right?
Odd how you never have a problem giving your personal opinion on Republicans
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
Yes, but the judge is not going to decide any guilt or innocence. The judge is simply going to decide if it is proper for Willis and her $675000 man friend to be able to continue.
Her guilt or innocence is going to be determined later.
Why are you afraid to give a personal opinion about her and this issue. But are never shy to give one when Republicans are involved?
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
No, he will determine if there’s any evidence that she did anything that breaks the law. In America, having a relationship doesn’t break any law.Glennfs wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:56 am Yes, but the judge is not going to decide any guilt or innocence. The judge is simply going to decide if it is proper for Willis and her $675000 man friend to be able to continue.
Her guilt or innocence is going to be determined later.
Why are you afraid to give a personal opinion about her and this issue. But are never shy to give one when Republicans are involved?
So if the judge doesn’t rule against her, and allows her to continue, you will still attack her, right?
And I’ve already said that I don’t see that she’s done anything illegal. Unlike Donald Trump.
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
I think the judge is deciding whether she has done anything which is grounds for disqualification. That would include legal and ethical violations. She doesn’t necessarily have to be guilty of a crime.gounion wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:18 pm No, he will determine if there’s any evidence that she did anything that breaks the law. In America, having a relationship doesn’t break any law.
So if the judge doesn’t rule against her, and allows her to continue, you will still attack her, right?
And I’ve already said that I don’t see that she’s done anything illegal. Unlike Donald Trump.
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
So regardless if what she has done is deemed legal or not what is your personal opinion of what she has done.gounion wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:18 pm No, he will determine if there’s any evidence that she did anything that breaks the law. In America, having a relationship doesn’t break any law.
So if the judge doesn’t rule against her, and allows her to continue, you will still attack her, right?
And I’ve already said that I don’t see that she’s done anything illegal. Unlike Donald Trump.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
A cop out imagine that. It's not about the relationship it is about her hiring her boyfriend and paying him 675k.
Odd how don't have any problem commenting on Thomas or any Republicans
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
Clarence Thomas' wife Ginni Thomas was in on the January 6 "tourist invasion" and Clarence Thomas is going to be listening to a case regarding that incident, when he should RECUSE himself!
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
Do you also believe that Willis should recuse herself for hiring her unqualified boyfriend and paying him over 650k?
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
We will know this week whether she broke any laws.
And Thomas is corrupt, that's clear. He takes payoffs. He's got the free quarter-million dollar RV to prove it. Funny how you go after Biden when his brother pays back a loan to him, so I guess if wealthy political operatives gave Biden everything in trips and RVs you'd be fine with it.
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
Timeline of Fani Willis
Nathan Wade was hired in 2021 after several other attorneys turned down the offer
https://www.ajc.com/politics/a-timeline ... SEJUWDIBE/
The relationship began in 2022
https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-f ... ORAK2BKMQ/
Wade's law firm is/was billing at $250 (per hour), same as Anna Cross's law firm. Third law firm was billing at $150 per hour. Indicating, of course, that Wade's law firm has put in more hours. Hard to say why there is a difference, but it's probably based on the services being provided. Maybe it's $150 an hour for Zoom consultations.
https://nypost.com/2024/01/15/news/fani ... than-wade/
I realize that using the NY Post link conflicts with this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9FauQOXN90
There may be misinformation. However, until proof can be provided of such we just have to go with what information is currently available because that's how it works. If unrestrained by the lack of proof of anything, discussions could be more fun but less informative.
Nathan Wade was hired in 2021 after several other attorneys turned down the offer
https://www.ajc.com/politics/a-timeline ... SEJUWDIBE/
The relationship began in 2022
https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-f ... ORAK2BKMQ/
Wade's law firm is/was billing at $250 (per hour), same as Anna Cross's law firm. Third law firm was billing at $150 per hour. Indicating, of course, that Wade's law firm has put in more hours. Hard to say why there is a difference, but it's probably based on the services being provided. Maybe it's $150 an hour for Zoom consultations.
https://nypost.com/2024/01/15/news/fani ... than-wade/
I realize that using the NY Post link conflicts with this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9FauQOXN90
There may be misinformation. However, until proof can be provided of such we just have to go with what information is currently available because that's how it works. If unrestrained by the lack of proof of anything, discussions could be more fun but less informative.
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
It’s funny that this is somehow unforgivable, she broke laws and should be in jail for it, but Trump can pay off porn stars and cover it up right before an election, and that’s just fine…
No outrage from Glenn over that, no sirree!
No outrage from Glenn over that, no sirree!
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
Hearing in Georgia going on now. Here’s the truth - If the judge disqualifies Willis, I will not complain. I will agree with the judge’s decision.
If she is cleared, Glenn will CERTAINLY attack the judge and not accept his decision.
If she is cleared, Glenn will CERTAINLY attack the judge and not accept his decision.
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
If he disqualifies Willis it will not mean she is guilty of any crime. That will be determined after an investigation not this hearing.
Odd how you don't have the balls to offer a personal opinion. Especially seeing how her current defense is based 100pct on legal loopholes
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
i have offered an opinion. I don’t see any wrongdoing. But I will accept the judge’s decision.Glennfs wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 9:42 am If he disqualifies Willis it will not mean she is guilty of any crime. That will be determined after an investigation not this hearing.
Odd how you don't have the balls to offer a personal opinion. Especially seeing how her current defense is based 100pct on legal loopholes
But you won’t, not if he clears Willis to continue. You believe Trump’s bullshit.
When Trump puts something forward, I usually know it’s a lie. It’s the safest bet in the world.
Re: First Clarence Thomas and now...
So what laws has Thomas brokengounion wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 9:44 am i have offered an opinion. I don’t see any wrongdoing. But I will accept the judge’s decision.
But you won’t, not if he clears Willis to continue. You believe Trump’s bullshit.
When Trump puts something forward, I usually know it’s a lie. It’s the safest bet in the world.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders