Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

News and events of the day
Post Reply
User avatar
Number6
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 7:18 pm

Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by Number6 »

The Michigan Supreme Court has overturned the state's Board of State Canvassers decision to not allow a constitutional amendment on abortion rights on the ballot in November. The Board of State Canvassers said the spacing of the words in the proposal caused wording to be "gibberish." Out of the seven justices, five voted to allow the proposal to appear on the ballot and two justices dissented. Out of over 730,000 voters who signed the proposal the Board of State Canvassers didn't provide a single signer who said they were confused but the spacing of the words.
After months of silence on the multiple attempts in the courts to protect abortion rights in Michigan, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that voters should get the chance to decide if abortion rights should be enshrined in the state Constitution.

The question in front of the state’s highest court was whether the Board of State Canvassers acted outside of its ministerial power when members deadlocked last week on whether or not to certify the Reproductive Freedom for All (RFFA) ballot proposal summary.

The two Republicans on the evenly split board voted against certifying the proposal because of a spacing error that squished together some words in the proposal language. Opponents who challenged the proposal argued that the proposal is “gibberish,” but advocates for the proposal say that the language is still legible and state election law does not regulate spacing.

Five of the seven Michigan Supreme Court justices agreed with the RFFA advocates — four nominated by Democrats and one nominated by the GOP. Justices Brian Zahra and David Viviano, both nominated by Republicans, dissented.

“The challengers have not produced a single signer who claims to have been confused by the limited-spacing sections in the full text portion of the proposal,” said Justice Bridget McCormack in her opinion. “Yet two members of the Board of State Canvassers would prevent the people of Michigan from voting on the proposal because they believe that the decreased spacing makes the text no longer ‘[t]he full text.’”
https://www.rawstory.com/michigan-supre ... re-voters/
IMO, the Board of State Canvassers were attempting to keep the proposal off the ballot because the feared it would produce a higher voter turnout and that it would hurt republican chances in that state.

Victory over Fascism!
When you vote left, you vote right.
bradman
Posts: 2595
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:03 am
Location: Home of the DFL

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by bradman »

In a world recently devoid of good news, it made my day when reading that this afternoon.

They made a big mistake and are now doing the big shoe shuffle........

https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/minnes ... 45060.html
Minnesota GOP candidate who once said he'd 'try to ban abortion' now declares it a 'constitutional right' while holding a baby as he trails in the polls
After previously saying he'd try to ban abortion, a Minnesota GOP candidate for governor is changing his tone as election day approaches and an apparent backlash against the anti-abortion movement surges.

In March, Scott Jensen, a family physician and the GOP candidate for governor, told MPR News that he would "try to ban abortion" if he was elected.

But in a new political ad released on Tuesday, Jensen holds baby and wears a burp cloth as he says abortion is a "protected constitutional right" in Minnesota and that "no governor can change that."

"And I'm not running to do that," Jensen says in the ad. Adding, "let's focus on the issues that matter" and accusing his Democratic opponent of using abortion as a political football.
[bold] Ya, right. Roe vs Wade is the law of the land.
I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat. [Will Rogers]
gounion
Posts: 17552
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by gounion »

Having this on the ballot will be a disaster for Michigan Republicans up and down the ballot. They're freaking out.
User avatar
ProfX
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:15 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by ProfX »

While it seems to make sense to remove popular propositions from the ballot if they are confusing or poorly worded, it seems bizarre to do so just on the basis of typography. I mean, if there are some issues with spacing or punctuation or whatever ... those are typographic and could just be fixed before it goes on the ballot.

When I heard about this, yes, it seemed awful dodgy they'd keep a ballot amendment off the ballot for ... spacing. :|
"Don't believe every quote attributed to people on the Internet" -- Abraham Lincoln :D
User avatar
Libertas
Posts: 6468
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:16 pm

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by Libertas »

Jesus, cons are outright fascists, arent they.

Cant have the proposition because of the SPACING?

Why not just say you do NOT believe in democracy.

Makes me mad, like remembering that vile FUCK traitor trump would not allow Obama's portraits. god DAMN him :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
I sigh in your general direction.
gounion
Posts: 17552
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by gounion »

ProfX wrote: Thu Sep 08, 2022 7:47 pm While it seems to make sense to remove popular propositions from the ballot if they are confusing or poorly worded, it seems bizarre to do so just on the basis of typography. I mean, if there are some issues with spacing or punctuation or whatever ... those are typographic and could just be fixed before it goes on the ballot.

When I heard about this, yes, it seemed awful dodgy they'd keep a ballot amendment off the ballot for ... spacing. :|
Nothing but corruption.
User avatar
carmenjonze
Posts: 9614
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:06 am

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by carmenjonze »

Kate 🪬🤍🇺🇸
@ImSpeaking13

Someone tell Amy Coney Barrett that her values called and said to go back to the kitchen where she belongs.

https://twitter.com/ImSpeaking13/status ... 3487156225
________________________________

The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.

~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
Motor City
Posts: 1835
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2021 5:46 pm

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by Motor City »

The abortion rights amendment made Michigan's ballot. Here's exactly what it says
The amendment proposes adding a "Section 28 Right to Reproductive Freedom" to Article 1 of the Michigan Constitution that would state the following:

"(1) Every individual has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make and effectuate decisions about all matters relating to pregnancy, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion care, miscarriage management, and infertility care.

An individual’s right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied, burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means.

Notwithstanding the above, the state may regulate the provision of abortion care after fetal viability, provided that in no circumstance shall the state prohibit an abortion that, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional, is medically indicated to protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.

(2) The state shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.

(3) The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived or alleged pregnancy outcomes, including but not limited to miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or assisting a pregnant individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with their voluntary consent.

(4) For the purposes of this section:

A state interest is 'compelling' only if it is for the limited purpose of protecting the health of an individual seeking care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and evidence-based medicine, and does not infringe on that individual's autonomous decision-making.

'Fetal viability' means: the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional and based on the particular facts of the case, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus's sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures.

(5) This section shall be self-executing. Any provision of this section held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section."

Voters won't see the full text of the proposed amendment on their ballots. Instead they will see the following summary, which was approved by the Board of State Canvassers:

"Proposal 22-3

A proposal to amend the state constitution to establish new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make all decisions about pregnancy and abortion; allow state to regulate abortion in some cases; and forbid prosecution of individuals exercising established right

This proposed constitutional amendment would:

Establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make and carry out all decisions about pregnancy, such as prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management, and infertility;

Allow state to regulate abortion after fetal viability, but not prohibit if medically needed to protect a patient's life or physical or mental health;

Forbid state discrimination in enforcement of this right; prohibit prosecution of an individual, or a person helping a pregnant individual, for exercising rights established by this amendment;

Invalidate state laws conflicting with this amendment.

Should this proposal be adopted?[ ] YES[ ] NO"
Image
User avatar
carmenjonze
Posts: 9614
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:06 am

Re: Michigan Supreme Court Rules Abortion Rights Proposal Can Go on the Ballot

Post by carmenjonze »

Motor City wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:43 pm The abortion rights amendment made Michigan's ballot. Here's exactly what it says

...

Should this proposal be adopted?[ ] YES[ ] NO
Should this proposal be adopted?[ x] YES[ ] NO
________________________________

The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.

~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
Post Reply