RadioFreeLiberal.com

Smart Voices, Be Heard
It is currently Sun Jun 24, 2018 4:45 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:39 pm 
Offline
Board Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Posts: 10786
Location: Sunny South Florida
All irony and sarcasm deeply intended. :roll:

Trump is about to make America much crueler to unionized workers
Union busters are going to win so much they get sick of winning.
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-unioniz ... d4ee89346d

Since Election Day, unions have lived on borrowed time. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which has exclusive authority over many key questions of labor law, is still controlled by Democrats — thus shielding workers and their unions from attacks that became far likelier the moment Donald Trump was declared the winner of the 2016 election.

But this period of interregnum is about to end. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) began the process of confirming the first of Trump’s two nominees to the NLRB on Monday. When both nominees sit on the Board, a swift rollback of union rights is likely.

As soon as this week, the Senate is likely to vote on Marvin Kaplan, the first of these two nominees. A former GOP Hill staffer, Kaplan drafted legislation—strongly supported by business lobby groups—which would have made it easier for employers to fight unionization campaigns.

Trump’s other nominee, William Emanuel, is a veteran management-side lawyer who touts his “particular expertise with laws concerning union access to the private property of employers.” He’s also filed briefs in three cases claiming that employers can force workers to waive their right to bring class actions and similar lawsuits.

[snip][end]

Workers of the world ... stop being conned by this conman.

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:23 am 
Offline
Board Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 2:01 pm
Posts: 6397
Location: Maine U.S.A
Sad how our forefathers working hard labor fought and died for human rights. The battle never ends.

_________________
Lest we forget
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:32 pm 
Offline
Policy Wonk
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:37 am
Posts: 3217
Keep on Truckin’ — No, Seriously Trump Wants You To

Quote:
The Trump administration has rolled back sleep and safety regulations for one of the most dangerous jobs in the country.........

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqbHi_jDF-I


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:02 am 
Offline
Board Emeritus

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:26 pm
Posts: 35519
The NLRB is where the work is done for or against labor that no one sees. When we have a Republican administration, they always put nasty anti-union folks in that try to obliterate workers. We had eight years with Bush. It was very tough.

But here's the thing - when we have a Democratic administration, we don't get the opposite, where they open the candy store. The people they put in don't always side with the worker, either. They usually come down on both sides, and you'll often lose at the NLRB. But at least is seems like a fair fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:13 pm 
Offline
Board Emeritus

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:27 pm
Posts: 7749
Location: miles from nowhere
the Age of Acquiescence by Steve Fraser.

hey, but don't worry. once people are laid off they can work on their brand.

christ, we are stupid.

_________________
bird's theorem-"we the people" are stupid.

"No one is so foolish as to choose war over peace. In peace sons bury their fathers, in war fathers bury their sons." - Herodotus


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 11:36 am 
Offline
Board Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Posts: 10786
Location: Sunny South Florida
Poll: Trump support among union members has fallen 15 points
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/38 ... -in-a-year

President Trump's support among America's union workers has dropped 15 points in just a year, according to a Reuters–Ipsos poll released Friday.

The president enjoyed an all-time high of more than 60 percent support among union workers in the same poll last March, an unusually strong number for a Republican.

But his support among the demographic has dropped steadily nearly every month since then, Reuters reports, despite his pursuit of trade tariffs that labor unions have traditionally supported.

Trump's support among union workers now sits at 47 percent, down from its all-time high of 62 percent, according to the poll. April numbers have not yet been released.

A graph released by Reuters notes that Trump tended to win union supporters in areas of the country, such as the Southwest and the Carolinas, where union workers make up a smaller percentage of the overall workforce.

[snip][end]

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2018 12:15 am 
Offline
Policy Wonk
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:37 am
Posts: 3217
TRUMP TAX PLAN NOT BOOSTING PAYCHECKS, VOTERS TELL POLLSTER

Quote:
A new poll shows that the majority of American voters haven't noticed an increase in their paychecks because of the Republican tax cuts, which went into effect this January.

The Politico and Morning Consult poll reported that 55 percent of respondents had not noticed any jumps in their paychecks over the “the past several weeks.” About 22 percent had noticed an increase, and 23 percent weren't sure. In February, only 51 percent of those surveyed said their paychecks had not increased.

In reality, many Americans saw a bit more money in their checks in February because of the tax plan. For single people making between $46,000 and $162,000, their bi-weekly paychecks were estimated to increase by roughly $40 to $190.

“We estimate that 90 percent of wage earners will experience an increase in their take home pay,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in January. “These tax cuts will ensure that American workers are able to keep more of their hard earned income and decide how to spend, invest or save it.”............

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqbHi_jDF-I


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2018 1:00 am 
Offline
Policy Wonk
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:37 am
Posts: 3217


most poor people dont make $46,000 a year

Unemployment rate hits new low for the recovery, but for the wrong reasons

Quote:
The big news in this morning’s jobs report is that the unemployment rate edged down to 3.9 percent, the first time it has gone below 4.0 percent since 2000. Unfortunately, this dip was accompanied by a fall in labor force participation. In other words, it fell for the “wrong” reasons—not because of a surge in the number of people getting jobs, but because of a rise in the number of people out of the labor force. Both the labor force participation rate and the employment-to-population ratio ticked down 0.1 percentage points.

Turning to the payroll survey, the economy added 164,000 jobs last month. All told, average monthly job creation over the past year is 190,000. After a higher-than-expected February and a lower-than-expected March.........


wonder how these people will vote or if they will vote

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqbHi_jDF-I


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2018 7:39 pm 
Offline
Board Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:06 pm
Posts: 12432

most poor people dont make $46,000 a year

Unemployment rate hits new low for the recovery, but for the wrong reasons



wonder how these people will vote or if they will vote

Anyone remember when Obama was president and the unemployment rate was falling? Out conservative "friends" said it wasn't because more people got jobs but because people were leaving the labor market.

_________________
IMPEACH NOW, REPLACE LATER!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 3:39 pm 
Offline
Board Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Posts: 10786
Location: Sunny South Florida
But he was going to be the one to look out for the little guy - right?

America's poor becoming more destitute under Trump: U.N. expert
https://www.yahoo.com/news/americas-poo ... 13560.html

GENEVA (Reuters) - Poverty in the United States is extensive and deepening under the Trump administration whose policies seem aimed at removing the safety net from millions of poor people, while rewarding the rich, a U.N. human rights investigator has found.

Philip Alston, U.N. special rapporteur on extreme poverty, called on U.S. authorities to provide solid social protection and address underlying problems, rather than "punishing and imprisoning the poor".

While welfare benefits and access to health insurance are being slashed, President Donald Trump's tax reform has awarded "financial windfalls" to the mega-rich and large companies, further increasing inequality, he said in a report.

U.S. policies since President Lyndon Johnson's war on poverty in the 1960s have been "neglectful at best," he said.

"But the policies pursued over the past year seem deliberately designed to remove basic protections from the poorest, punish those who are not in employment and make even basic health care into a privilege to be earned rather than a right of citizenship," Alston said.

Almost 41 million people or 12.7 percent live in poverty, 18.5 million in extreme poverty, and children account for one in three poor, he said. The United States has the highest youth poverty rate among industrialized countries, he added.

"Its citizens live shorter and sicker lives compared to those living in all other rich democracies, eradicable tropical diseases are increasingly prevalent and it has the world's highest incarceration rate ... and the highest obesity levels in the developed world," Alston said.

[snip]

It is based on his mission in December to several U.S. states, including rural Alabama, a slum in downtown Los Angeles, California, and the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico.

Citing "shameful statistics" linked to entrenched racial discrimination, Alston said that African Americans are 2.5 times more likely than whites to live in poverty and their unemployment rate is more than double. Women, Hispanics, immigrants, and indigenous people also suffer high rates.

At least 550,000 people are homeless in America, he said.

"The tax reform will worsen this situation and ensure that the United States remains the most unequal society in the developed world," Alston said. "The planned dramatic cuts in welfare will essentially shred crucial dimensions of a safety net that is already full of holes."

The tax overhaul, which sailed through the Republican-controlled U.S. Congress in December, permanently cut the top corporate rate to 21 percent from 35 percent. Tax cuts for individuals, however, are temporary and expire after 2025.

[snip][end]

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 5:02 pm 
Offline
Policy Wonk
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:37 am
Posts: 3217
Harley-Davidson workers say plant closure after tax cut is like a bad dream

https://twitter.com/allinwithchris/status/999091834801524742

You might need to have more money withheld from your paycheck

Almost half of US families can't afford basics like rent and food

Quote:
.........Many of these folks are the nation's child care workers, home health aides, office assistants and store clerks, who work low-paying jobs and have little savings, the study noted. Some 66% of jobs in the US pay less than $20 an hour.......


Working Anything but 9 to 5

Quote:
In a typical last-minute scramble, Jannette Navarro, a 22-year-old Starbucks barista and single mother, scraped together a plan for surviving the month of July without setting off family or financial disaster.

In contrast to the joyless work she had done at a Dollar Tree store and a KFC franchise, the $9-an-hour Starbucks job gave Ms. Navarro, the daughter of a drug addict and an absentee father, the hope of forward motion. She had been hired because she showed up so many times, cheerful and persistent, asking for work, and she had a way of flicking away setbacks — such as a missed bus on her three-hour commute — with the phrase, “I’m over it.”

Newly off public assistance, she was just a few credits shy of an associate degree in business and talked of getting a master’s degree as some of her co-workers were. Her take-home pay rarely topped $400 to $500 every two weeks; since starting in November, she had set aside $900 toward a car — her next step toward stability and independence for herself and her 4-year-old son, Gavin.

But Ms. Navarro’s fluctuating hours, combined with her limited resources, had also turned their lives into a chronic crisis over the clock. She rarely learned her schedule more than three days before the start of a workweek, plunging her into urgent logistical puzzles over who would watch the boy. Months after starting the job she moved out of her aunt’s home, in part because of mounting friction over the erratic schedule, which the aunt felt was also holding her family captive. Ms. Navarro’s degree was on indefinite pause because her shifting hours left her unable to commit to classes. She needed to work all she could, sometimes counting on dimes from the tip jar to make the bus fare home. If she dared ask for more stable hours, she feared, she would get fewer work hours over all.

“You’re waiting on your job to control your life,” she said, with the scheduling software used by her employer dictating everything from “how much sleep Gavin will get to what groceries I’ll be able to buy this month.”

Last month, she was scheduled to ........


Which Poor People Shouldn’t Have to Work for Aid?

Dan Gilbert gets state OK for $618M in tax breaks for Detroit projects

Go fund yourself: crowdfunding is now an essential part of America's safety net

Alleged meat thief fatally shot in head at Eastern Market

Quote:
.......An alleged thief was fatally shot by the owner of a trucking company that was making a meat delivery at Eastern Market on Wednesday morning, Detroit police said.........


We all can join a new campaign against enduring poverty and injustice

Quote:
.......“Every generation, whether it’s the abolition movement in the 1850s or it’s the women’s suffrage movement in the late 1800s, early 1900s, or it’s the Bonus Marches that helped produce the New Deal in the 1930s, every generation has to stand up. There has to be a moral dissent and a moral critique in every, every, every generation. If there is injustice, if there is oppression, every generation has to pick it up. The success begins when you stand up and challenge it.”.........


not enough to just not be trump.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqbHi_jDF-I


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 5:13 pm 
Offline
Board Emeritus

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:26 pm
Posts: 35519
Corporations aren't spending their money on current facilities or worker pay. Only 10 Fortune 500 companies did anything for their workers with the savings, usually a one-time bonus, instead of raises that would last like the tax cut will last, year after year.

Instead, they are closing plants and moving them with the money, and doing stock buy-backs to increase profits.

Nothing for workers. Nothing at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 5:21 pm 
Offline
Board Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Posts: 10786
Location: Sunny South Florida
not enough to just not be trump.


Oh yeah. We have to be so much better. Granted, that is clearing the lowest of bars, but still.

Dunno, a lot of the punditocracy are saying the Democrats need to run on being more than just not-Trump.

The good news is, they're pulling that out of their ass, because I don't know any who are merely running on not being him: they're running on a REAL agenda for working people, not just bullshit, con jobs, and smoke and mirrors.

I kinda like the name "A Better Deal". Yes, echoes of FDR. Yes, a rejoinder to the guy who ran on being a dealmaker, said he would make better deals for the American people, but has mostly conned the living fuck out of them. And grifted for himself, his friends, and his family.

I'm glad you and I both like Leonard Pitts. Of course, I see him all the time in the Miami Herald.

I’m done trying to understand Trump supporters. Why don’t they try to understand me?
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/opn- ... 97509.html

This is for Rose.

She is a nice lady who wrote me a nice email in which she spoke about the need to try to understand Donald Trump’s supporters. As Rose put it, “We need to not close ourselves off to how the other side thinks.” It’s a sentiment I hear a lot from progressives, and it bespeaks a great generosity of spirit.

But I couldn’t disagree more.

Don’t get me wrong. Thinking people will always try to see past their own ideological blind spots, to put themselves into the shoes of those they disagree with. That’s an admirable trait. In normal times it’s a trait I would applaud with enthusiasm.

But these are not normal times. Indeed, sometimes, I wonder if we appreciate just how abnormal — how fraught with danger — they really are. Under Trump, American laws, news media and mores are under assault, to say nothing of American democracy itself.

And I’m sorry, but I don’t think “understanding” Trump followers will ameliorate — or even address — any of that. Besides which, is there really so much left to “understand?”

Not from where I sit. Long before Trump even existed as a political force, many of us noted with alarm the rise of a backlash among right wingers deeply angry and profoundly terrified by the writing on the demographic wall. Said writing foretold — and for that matter, still foretells — the declining preeminence of white, Christian America. As several studies now show, a sense of alarmed displacement among white, Christian America is the soil from which the weed of Trumpism grew.

The idea that we must “understand” those folks carries with it an implicit suggestion that in so doing, we might find some ground for compromise. It would be a great idea in normal times. But again, these times are not normal.

No compromise is possible here for a simple reason Trump followers seem to understand better than the rest of us: You can’t compromise with demography, can’t order numbers to stop being what they are and saying what they say about the coming tide of change. But what you can do is seize the levers of power and change the rules of the game in hopes of blunting the force of that tide. That — again, look at the studies — is what Trump supporters elected him to do.

So while, it is admirable to think “understanding” can fix this country, it is also naive. Progressives should ask themselves: When’s the last time you heard any Trump supporters talking about the need to understand you? You haven’t — and that ought to tell you something.

Here’s the thing: the rest of us have the moral high ground here. We see the same demographic writing on the wall that Trump followers see, but where it makes them angry and fearful, it leaves us energized. Many of us are excited to see the nation that will arise from this cauldron of change.

That’s because the idea of change doesn’t threaten us. It will challenge us, yes, but we’re ready for that. We know that this a big country, big enough for many different kinds of people, many different ways of life. We know what it means to live and let live. And we know that welcoming the stranger, caring for the stranger, is simply what you do as a human being.

I submit that those are core American virtues. And that now would be an excellent time for progressives to exhibit a little courage in their defense. Trump followers see a nation in demographic peril, so they seek a nation where those who frighten them can be regulated into irrelevance. There’s no big mystery about that. There never has been. So no, they don’t really need to be understood.

What they need to be, is defeated.

[snip][end]

Preach that from the mountaintop, brother. Amen.

I'm done with "understanding" the Trumpistas. Are they trying to understand me - as a Jew, as a liberal, living in a place where I think the Hispanics outnumber me the Gringo, as one of those college professors they seem to hate, as a struggling member of the working class? As somebody who so fucking wished I didn't have to see a burning swastika in 2018? I live there, too. No, they just want me to drink my tears and shut up MFing snowflake.

I'm on to kicking their muthafucking ass in November.

I'm so fucking done with UNDERSTANDING them. They've been clear what they think of me, the shit flung at me stinks. Payback is a mother, bitches.

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 6:13 pm 
Offline
Policy Wonk
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:37 am
Posts: 3217
ProfessorX wrote:

Oh yeah. We have to be so much better. Granted, that is clearing the lowest of bars, but still.

Dunno, a lot of the punditocracy are saying the Democrats need to run on being more than just not-Trump.

The good news is, they're pulling that out of their ass, because I don't know any who are merely running on not being him: they're running on a REAL agenda for working people, not just bullshit, con jobs, and smoke and mirrors.

I kinda like the name "A Better Deal". Yes, echoes of FDR. Yes, a rejoinder to the guy who ran on being a dealmaker, said he would make better deals for the American people, but has mostly conned the living fuck out of them. And grifted for himself, his friends, and his family.

I'm glad you and I both like Leonard Pitts. Of course, I see him all the time in the Miami Herald.

I’m done trying to understand Trump supporters. Why don’t they try to understand me?
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/opn- ... 97509.html

This is for Rose.

She is a nice lady who wrote me a nice email in which she spoke about the need to try to understand Donald Trump’s supporters. As Rose put it, “We need to not close ourselves off to how the other side thinks.” It’s a sentiment I hear a lot from progressives, and it bespeaks a great generosity of spirit.

But I couldn’t disagree more.

Don’t get me wrong. Thinking people will always try to see past their own ideological blind spots, to put themselves into the shoes of those they disagree with. That’s an admirable trait. In normal times it’s a trait I would applaud with enthusiasm.

But these are not normal times. Indeed, sometimes, I wonder if we appreciate just how abnormal — how fraught with danger — they really are. Under Trump, American laws, news media and mores are under assault, to say nothing of American democracy itself.

And I’m sorry, but I don’t think “understanding” Trump followers will ameliorate — or even address — any of that. Besides which, is there really so much left to “understand?”

Not from where I sit. Long before Trump even existed as a political force, many of us noted with alarm the rise of a backlash among right wingers deeply angry and profoundly terrified by the writing on the demographic wall. Said writing foretold — and for that matter, still foretells — the declining preeminence of white, Christian America. As several studies now show, a sense of alarmed displacement among white, Christian America is the soil from which the weed of Trumpism grew.

The idea that we must “understand” those folks carries with it an implicit suggestion that in so doing, we might find some ground for compromise. It would be a great idea in normal times. But again, these times are not normal.

No compromise is possible here for a simple reason Trump followers seem to understand better than the rest of us: You can’t compromise with demography, can’t order numbers to stop being what they are and saying what they say about the coming tide of change. But what you can do is seize the levers of power and change the rules of the game in hopes of blunting the force of that tide. That — again, look at the studies — is what Trump supporters elected him to do.

So while, it is admirable to think “understanding” can fix this country, it is also naive. Progressives should ask themselves: When’s the last time you heard any Trump supporters talking about the need to understand you? You haven’t — and that ought to tell you something.

Here’s the thing: the rest of us have the moral high ground here. We see the same demographic writing on the wall that Trump followers see, but where it makes them angry and fearful, it leaves us energized. Many of us are excited to see the nation that will arise from this cauldron of change.

That’s because the idea of change doesn’t threaten us. It will challenge us, yes, but we’re ready for that. We know that this a big country, big enough for many different kinds of people, many different ways of life. We know what it means to live and let live. And we know that welcoming the stranger, caring for the stranger, is simply what you do as a human being.

I submit that those are core American virtues. And that now would be an excellent time for progressives to exhibit a little courage in their defense. Trump followers see a nation in demographic peril, so they seek a nation where those who frighten them can be regulated into irrelevance. There’s no big mystery about that. There never has been. So no, they don’t really need to be understood.

What they need to be, is defeated.

[snip][end]

Preach that from the mountaintop, brother. Amen.

I'm done with "understanding" the Trumpistas. Are they trying to understand me - as a Jew, as a liberal, living in a place where I think the Hispanics outnumber me the Gringo, as one of those college professors they seem to hate, as a struggling member of the working class? As somebody who so fucking wished I didn't have to see a burning swastika in 2018? I live there, too. No, they just want me to drink my tears and shut up MFing snowflake.

I'm on to kicking their muthafucking ass in November.

I'm so fucking done with UNDERSTANDING them. They've been clear what they think of me, the shit flung at me stinks. Payback is a mother, bitches.


and that helps the poor and oppressed how? having and making a choice isnt whats wrong with our democracy, whats wrong is the people left out and oppressed from that. I can certainly understand people not wanting someone friendly to racial supremacists to have power over them, I can also however understand people not wanting someone friendly to austerity that can leave them homeless and vulnerable to the elements, neither is wrong but neither is right either because neither are acceptable at least not to human being supporters.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqbHi_jDF-I


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 6:31 pm 
Offline
Board Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Posts: 10786
Location: Sunny South Florida
and that helps the poor and oppressed how?


Did you read the UN rapporteur's report? There's a reason I posted it.

Yes, it notes the American problem of poverty is perennial. It also notes that the situation is growing far worse under Trump.

Truth is, in November, this November, we can really do two key things by putting more Democrats in Congress:

1) start showing what the party can do with a president who won't veto their bills
2) you need majorities in both chambers for impeachment ... I'm only slightly psychic, but I have this spider sense feeling the Mueller Report, whenever it's released, will contain impeachable offenses.

Dunno, I agree we need to do lots of stuff after, but step one is getting rid of his policies. Also, BTW, the fundamental autocratic threat he represents to our democratic systems.

Remember, homey, I'm totally on board with Rev. William Barber's goals. OK, we might quibble over his strategies. I get why as a social movement leader he has to act as if both parties equally need being lectured to. I seem to recall it was only one party who invited him in 2016 to their party's convention, to roaring applause.

Quote:
having and making a choice isnt whats wrong with our democracy, whats wrong is the people left out and oppressed from that.


Yes, and I am totally onboard with efforts to fight voter caging, voter suppression, the weakening of the Voting Rights Act, and Gov. Skeletor's efforts to make voting in Florida harder for everybody and poor people, students, and minorities in particular by lessening early voting opportunities. And these crappy voter ID laws.

I'm not going to bring up the Russians hacking & fucking with our voting system. I know that's not on your radar. It's fine, it's on mine.

You know, there's no real point to bragging about what we do offline, nobody can verify it, but I will just say personally resisting voter disenfranchisement, particularly minority voters, is something I've been active on for a long time. I also know many Democrats who are as passionate about it as I am.

Quote:
I can certainly understand people not wanting someone friendly to racial supremacists to have power over them, I can also however understand people not wanting someone friendly to austerity that can leave them homeless and vulnerable to the elements, neither is wrong but neither is right either because neither are acceptable at least not to human being supporters.


The either/or of how you posit things is what I find odd.

The person who was friendlier to racial supremacists (Trump) was also friendlier to austerity.

I'm not saying Clinton would have been best buds with everything on the progressive agenda, but she sure as fuck would not have cut spending to various government programs to the degree Trump has, including health care.

Yes, I know Trump mumbled at one point he wanted our health care system to take care of everybody. Meanwhile, he's slashed ACA, tried to eliminate it, and thrown more people off health insurance. Fact. He said he wouldn't touch Social Security or Medicaid or Medicare. He fucking lied, Paul Ryan and him started working on doing it, your and my bud Michael Moore has noticed.

So the choice was between the more racist, more pro-austerity guy and the more inclusive, less-austerity gal. It wasn't like this was an either/or for me. I'm not saying Clinton was gold from heaven, but in life, it's often about taking the better over the worse, not the perfect.

_________________
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:36 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:43 pm
Posts: 231
Location: Hot as heck NC
He's so cold he makes Bud Ice jealous.

_________________
My book, "Landmarks with Light" has been updated and is on the site at
http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/2125893

If you're interested in lighthouses, you might want to check it out.


DON'T BLAME ME I VOTED AGAINST AMENDMENT ONE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group