BREAKING: In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court has

News and events of the day
Post Reply
User avatar
Libertas
Posts: 6468
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:16 pm

BREAKING: In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court has

Post by Libertas »

https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/1644049 ... 58393?s=20

BREAKING: In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court has pissed off board cons who HATE Trans folks...(last part is me talking)


https://apnews.com/article/supreme-cour ... 84d7762c31

Thomas and Alito wanted to destroy this child, but the other 7 said no. Board cons are having a sad today. Personally, I am shocked that ACB didnt take this opportunity to destroy this child.


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed a 12-year-old transgender girl in West Virginia to continue competing on her middle school’s girls sports teams while a lawsuit over a state ban continues.

The justices refused to disturb an appeals court order that made it possible for the girl, Becky Pepper-Jackson, to continue playing on her school’s track and cross-country teams, where she regularly finishes near the back of the pack.

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas would have allowed West Virginia to enforce its law against Pepper-Jackson.

Pepper-Jackson is in the middle of the outdoor track season. She had filed a lawsuit challenging the law, the Save Women’s Sports Act, which West Virginia lawmakers adopted in 2021. A federal appeals court had allowed her to compete while she appealed a lower court ruling that upheld the West Virginia law.

Two weeks ago, track and field banned transgender athletes from international competitions. West Virginia is among 20 states that ban transgender athletes from participating in sports consistent with their gender identity, according to Movement Advancement Project, a pro-LGBTQ rights think tank.
I sigh in your general direction.
gounion
Posts: 17251
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: BREAKING: In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court has

Post by gounion »

Great news with one quibble - The order was unsigned, although per usual, Ailto and Thomas stood against human rights. Other than that, we know that at least five were in favor, two others might have stood against.
User avatar
Libertas
Posts: 6468
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:16 pm

Re: BREAKING: In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court has

Post by Libertas »

Big problem I just got this response on DU when I said I was shocked that ACB did this


Don't be shocked...

They're letting the State Ban run it's way through the Court system.

If THAT came before SCOTUS you can bet 6-3 they'd find it Constitutional.

By the way we need Soros to finance 10 million of us to go to TN today, to REINSTATE those 3 Democrats, PHYSICALLY :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
I sigh in your general direction.
User avatar
Drak
Posts: 4493
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 3:02 pm

Re: BREAKING: In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court has

Post by Drak »

Surprising but the right thing. Thomas and Ailto are not fit.
"Some of those that work forces,
Are the same that burn crosses"

- Rage Against the Machine
Glennfs
Posts: 10306
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:54 pm

Re: BREAKING: In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court has

Post by Glennfs »

Libertas wrote: Thu Apr 06, 2023 2:14 pm Big problem I just got this response on DU when I said I was shocked that ACB did this






By the way we need Soros to finance 10 million of us to go to TN today, to REINSTATE those 3 Democrats, PHYSICALLY :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
I thought you were opposed to lawmakers who incite violence
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Post Reply