Texas Abortion Law Case

News and events of the day
User avatar
ProfX
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:15 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by ProfX »

Bludogdem wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:12 pm I’m sure there’s more.
Maybe but you seem most interested in disagreeing with the liberals here, so I don't know what those things would be. You don't often indicate points of agreement.

If you were someone whom I''ve encountered on previous versions of this board who made that very same statement, well, again, but then that might require you to admit something else. Which I can see why you wouldn't.
"Don't believe every quote attributed to people on the Internet" -- Abraham Lincoln :D
User avatar
Libertas
Posts: 6468
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:16 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by Libertas »

How many dead Women is enough for the cons including those here?

If you read about 200 Women dying next year due to illegal, unsafe procedures or birth control devices, will that satisfy your desire to kill Women who disobey?

Hopefully America is waking up, but I am not sure.
I sigh in your general direction.
Bludogdem
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:16 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by Bludogdem »

ProfX wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:20 pm Maybe but you seem most interested in disagreeing with the liberals here, so I don't know what those things would be. You don't often indicate points of agreement.

If you were someone whom I''ve encountered on previous versions of this board who made that very same statement, well, again, but then that might require you to admit something else. Which I can see why you wouldn't.
I don’t see situations like Rittenhouse as a liberal issue. In my opinion he was wrong to be there. He was wrong to be armed. Regardless, my interest is the proper application of the law. Plus I’m an avowed blue dog. So I’m likely to disagree with some liberal ideas and liberal stances.
User avatar
Drak
Posts: 4493
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 3:02 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by Drak »

Bludogdem wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:09 pm Plus I’m an avowed blue dog. So I’m likely to disagree with some liberal ideas and liberal stances.
Dude knock it off with the BS.
"Some of those that work forces,
Are the same that burn crosses"

- Rage Against the Machine
User avatar
Libertas
Posts: 6468
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:16 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by Libertas »

Drak wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:11 pm Dude knock it off with the BS.
They cant knock off the lies and hypocrisy, if they did they would have to admit they are wrong about everything.
I sigh in your general direction.
User avatar
ProfX
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:15 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by ProfX »

Bludogdem wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:09 pm Plus I’m an avowed blue dog. So I’m likely to disagree with some liberal ideas and liberal stances.
I get that. If you are, in fact, an avowed Blue Dog, this means you WOULD agree with people here, at least around 50% of the time or so.

Points of agreement from you are very rare. We may agree on stuff, as you say, but I'm really not actually psychic; I can't know what those are, until you indicate them.
"Don't believe every quote attributed to people on the Internet" -- Abraham Lincoln :D
User avatar
Drak
Posts: 4493
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 3:02 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by Drak »

Drak wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:11 pm Dude knock it off with the BS.
BTW, this wasn't meant as a command of any kind. It's more like, "As if."
"Some of those that work forces,
Are the same that burn crosses"

- Rage Against the Machine
User avatar
Libertas
Posts: 6468
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:16 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by Libertas »

Drak wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:24 pm BTW, this wasn't meant as a command of any kind. It's more like, "As if."
Hi, my name is Jackson and Im a democrat like you, maybe a little more conservative.

I listen to all kinds of different talkshows because I want to hear all sides, I actually also own a small business and have some real problems with Obamacare.
I sigh in your general direction.
User avatar
sam lefthand
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:58 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by sam lefthand »

ProfX wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:17 pm I get that. If you are, in fact, an avowed Blue Dog, this means you WOULD agree with people here, at least around 50% of the time or so.

Points of agreement from you are very rare. We may agree on stuff, as you say, but I'm really not actually psychic; I can't know what those are, until you indicate them.
X, I would think that would more realistically be 95% or more percent of the time. That's about the amount the Blue Dog House and Senate members vote with our side. It's almost always.

Both Elizabeth Warren and John Tester are amoung the lowest, but are still voting to support Biden above 95% of the time.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/bi ... ess-votes/

:|

Hell, Susan Collins is voting to support Biden 82% or 83% of the time. Lisa Murkowski is at 78% or 79% of the time. And they're Republicans.
gounion
Posts: 17051
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:59 pm

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by gounion »

sam lefthand wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:58 pm X, I would think that would more realistically be 95% or more percent of the time. That's about the amount the Blue Dog House and Senate members vote with our side. It's almost always.

Both Elizabeth Warren and John Tester are amoung the lowest, but are still voting to support Biden above 95% of the time.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/bi ... ess-votes/

:|

Hell, Susan Collins is voting to support Biden 82% or 83% of the time. Lisa Murkowski is at 78% or 79% of the time. And they're Republicans.
Which shows that GreenGrass is here pretending to be something other than a far-right conservative ideologue. Something that's apparent.
User avatar
ProfX
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:15 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Texas Abortion Law Case

Post by ProfX »

sam lefthand wrote: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:58 pm X, I would think that would more realistically be 95% or more percent of the time. T
Well, our "Blue Dog Democrat" is not agreeing with people on this board 95% of the time.

But I know, we're wild-eyed frenzied radical socialists who wanna destroy America. :roll:

I'm just gonna repeat ... if all you do is chime in to say you disagree with other people, they will tend to assume you largely disagree with them.

This might even lead to suspicions of dishonesty and socking, and I can see why. Especially when the things you say you DO love are largely the same as other socks that have been on previous board iterations.

And with that, I'm done.

EDIT: OK, I'm not.

Greengrass was rude as shit.
"Winchester" whatever his old username was on the old board was just more passive rude, but still rude, and got it back. He also was an idiot who for reasons I can't fathom showed his "moderation" by suggesting maybe Trump was right about shoving ultraviolet light up your arsehole. He also said he was a master of the law because he gave up being the chair of his law department to take a CIA job instead. :roll:
If "BLD" is the same person, as long as he isn't rude, and so far he hasn't been, I will treat him respectfully. But it sure looks like we disagree on a lot, that's OK, I am neither blue nor a dog. :D

It's odd how much "Winchester" was a fan of SpaceX, Elon Musk, and what he called "space capitalism" and I see a lot of isomorphism, but that could just be coincidence.
"Don't believe every quote attributed to people on the Internet" -- Abraham Lincoln :D
Post Reply