Jeffrey Epstein contact names released by court. Here are key takeaways from the unsealed documents.

[ap215]

Jeffrey Epstein contact names released by court. Here are key takeaways from the unsealed documents.

Documents that reveal the names of dozens of people connected to Jeffrey Epstein, including business associates and accusers, among others, were made public on Wednesday, Jan. 3, following a federal judge's December ruling that the information be unsealed.

Though the unsealed court documents don't contain an actual list of associates, the names are expected to include some that also appeared on the flight logs of Epstein's private jet, nicknamed the "Lolita Express," which he often used to fly to his private island in the Caribbean. Those manifests and other documents, such as his private calendar, had previously been made public, including as part of legal proceedings or public records requests. Many of those who had business or social ties with Epstein, a convicted sex offender, have denied any misconduct or involvement in his activities.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-ep ... documents/

[Glennfs]

As usual in these cases no names other than 3 in the story.
Everytime something like this comes up they always claim that people will be named. But, they never are.

[ZoWie]

Nooz is all over Clinton, of course. Otherwise, so far a non-story.

[Toonces]

Investigate everyone on the list. Prosecute where necessary, regardless of who they are.

If it's anyone I admired, supported, liked, etc, then make sure they are properly punished where applicable. I'm holding "my guys" to a higher standard because it is what I expect.

Not that I admire or support any of them. I did like Clinton but, you know, F' him.

I predicted that Dershowitz would start just naming others. He's already doing the "yeah, but X did this" stuff, to try and distract from himself and try to water down any accusations against him.

[ZoWie]

Careful it doesn't turn into another excuse for a Republican necktie party.

[JoeMemphis]

Investigate everyone on the list. Prosecute where necessary, regardless of who they are.

If it's anyone I admired, supported, liked, etc, then make sure they are properly punished where applicable. I'm holding "my guys" to a higher standard because it is what I expect.

Not that I admire or support any of them. I did like Clinton but, you know, F' him.

I predicted that Dershowitz would start just naming others. He's already doing the "yeah, but X did this" stuff, to try and distract from himself and try to water down any accusations against him.

I’m not sure you can make much of a case from what has been released. I do think trying these folks in the press isn’t fair. Just because they are mentioned doesn’t mean they are guilty of any wrong doing. Investigate them, if necessary, I agree. Get back to us if there is enough to indict.

[Number6]

Investigate everyone on the list. Prosecute where necessary, regardless of who they are.

If it's anyone I admired, supported, liked, etc, then make sure they are properly punished where applicable. I'm holding "my guys" to a higher standard because it is what I expect.

Not that I admire or support any of them. I did like Clinton but, you know, F' him.

I predicted that Dershowitz would start just naming others. He's already doing the "yeah, but X did this" stuff, to try and distract from himself and try to water down any accusations against him.

I agree. Regardless of a person's politics, wealth, celebrity status, influence, etc..., if the committed a crime then they need to be held accountable for the crime.

[Glennfs]

Nooz is all over Clinton, of course. Otherwise, so far a non-story.

Evidently he likes em young

[Glennfs]

Nooz is all over Clinton, of course. Otherwise, so far a non-story.

A CBS story I read said Trump was there but not accused. Something I found surprising.

[Number6]

I’m not sure you can make much of a case from what has been released. I do think trying these folks in the press isn’t fair. Just because they are mentioned doesn’t mean they are guilty of any wrong doing. Investigate them, if necessary, I agree. Get back to using there is enough to indict.

I don't think these people are being tried in the press. Any person appearing in the media will be judged because it's just human nature to do so. From what I've seen and read it's mainly just the names and nothing to support the idea they did anything wrong. However, regardless of how it is reported, people are going to judge them mainly based on their perception of the persons and their own personal biases. The four judgements they'll make are automatically guilty; innocent until proven guilty; wait until further evidence comes forward before making a judgement; and who give a shit.

[Number6]

Evidently he likes em young

SO, you and Clinton have something in common!

Just kidding. Don't get your panties in a wad.

[Glennfs]

SO, you and Clinton have something in common!

Just kidding. Don't get your panties in a wad.

I can tell the difference between a joke and the other.

[JoeMemphis]

I don't think these people are being tried in the press. Any person appearing in the media will be judged because it's just human nature to do so. From what I've seen and read it's mainly just the names and nothing to support the idea they did anything wrong. However, regardless of how it is reported, people are going to judge them mainly based on their perception of the persons and their own personal biases. The four judgements they'll make are automatically guilty; innocent until proven guilty; wait until further evidence comes forward before making a judgement; and who give a shit.

I find myself more in line with 3 and 4.

[Glennfs]

The entire issue will last about 3 maybe 4 days. Because there are both Republicans and Democrats on the list the media will burry the story.

[gounion]

The entire issue will last about 3 maybe 4 days. Because there are both Republicans and Democrats on the list the media will burry the story.

It’s what the elite of our nation does. All those morals you guys talk about? Those are only for the little people. They can have any kind of sex they want, and they’ll vote against ANY extra-marital sex for anyone else, and if their daughter needs an abortion, they’ll just fly them to Canada for it, away from prying eyes.

And you won’t attack Clinton because Trump is on that list.

[Glennfs]

It’s what the elite of our nation does. All those morals you guys talk about? Those are only for the little people. They can have any kind of sex they want, and they’ll vote against ANY extra-marital sex for anyone else, and if their daughter needs an abortion, they’ll just fly them to Canada for it, away from prying eyes.

And you won’t attack Clinton because Trump is on that list.

Well we do have a president who took inappropriate showers with his daughter proving you are correct.

[gounion]

Well we do have a president who took inappropriate showers with his daughter proving you are correct

You don't mind lying about Dems, do you?

[Glennfs]

You don't mind lying about Dems, do you?

So his daughter lied in her diary.

[gounion]

So his daughter lied in her diary.

We don't even know if the dairy was hers, or if that was actually in her dairy. But you don't need actual evidence, do you? Rumors are enough for you.

[Glennfs]

We don't even know if the dairy was hers, or if that was actually in her dairy. But you don't need actual evidence, do you? Rumors are enough for you.

And Hunter's laptop was also fake.

[gounion]

And Hunter's laptop was also fake.

Probably the hard drive that Rudy was shopping around was fake. The FBI has the actual laptops, and they aren't saying if it's real or not.

The Russians did hack Hunter's cloud account, and have been shopping it around, but it's mostly a few dick pics, which seems to be of great interest to your side.

[Glennfs]

Probably the hard drive that Rudy was shopping around was fake. The FBI has the actual laptops, and they aren't saying if it's real or not.

The Russians did hack Hunter's cloud account, and have been shopping it around, but it's mostly a few dick pics, which seems to be of great interest to your side.

Of course it was fake just like Ashley's diary.

Here is a fake article full of fake facts about Hunter including the laptop and the Russian hoax story.



https://nypost.com/2024/01/04/news/hunt ... first-son/

[gounion]

Of course it was fake just like Ashley's diary.

Here is a fake article full of fake facts about Hunter including the laptop and the Russian hoax story.



https://nypost.com/2024/01/04/news/hunt ... first-son/

Yeah, because the New York Post, a Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid, is the last word in factuality.

[Glennfs]

Yeah, because the New York Post, a Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid, is the last word in factuality.

I know the New York Post is bias because I heard so on MSNBC

[gounion]

I know the New York Post is bias because I heard so on MSNBC

It's a tabloid.

Glenn, if I used an article from Mother Jones, would YOU accept it?