Yea right, I can imagine what you would be saying if the Biden family were republican.
You do know the guy who paid 100s of thousands for Hunter's so called art is also the guy who paid his IRS fines.
Yea right, I can imagine what you would be saying if the Biden family were republican.
Again, a country wanting to curry favor and can give Trump’s kid $2 billion and nothing to see here.
Toonces wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 4:06 pm Art is subjective as is, often, it's value.
Much of the time people will buy art based on the name, because that's more of a status thing.
A painting by Adolf Hitler would fetch a higher price because of who painted it, not because of how good the painting is, which in his case would be "not good". Same with GW Bush.
It would also be the same for the child of any celebrity or other well know figure.
There is plenty of art out there that gets sold for a lot that is just (in my opinion) utter crap. There is plenty of art that is fantastic, but sells for barely more than the cost of materials.
That Hunter's art may be selling for well over what seems normal may have a completely reasonable explanation in the art world, that being that sometimes that people pay way more than you might think it is worth because of who painted it.
"That there is a Hunter Biden" instead of "That's a painting of a Golden doodle"
If someone offers you an absurd amount for one of your paintings, you'd probably take it.
The art I buy is because I just happen to like it. I have quite a bit from the same artist because I like his work. I don't really but things based on the name alone, though some names do represent a better quality.
TL;DR
Some people buy art based on name and status. The price may seem unreasonable to some, but it will be reasonable to others
This is merely perspective, and is not intended to say that this is exactly what happened. Maybe something shady did happen, but maybe it's simply another example of how the art world continues to be incomprehensible. I've not actually seen any of the art in question. Chances are it would be something I would not buy unless it was really cheap. After all, I do have limited wall space.
You are correct both the Trump family and the Biden family are in the business of selling influence. The Trump family just happens to be more successful.
So it's only a crime when a republican family sells influence.
There is ZERO evidence that Joe Biden sold influence. NONE.
So those foreign entities hired James and Hunter out of kindness.
Just because Trump is nothing but transactional, you think everyone is.
Seems to me he’s pissing in the wind. He’s tried to get thousands of followers to converge on the Court like he did the Capitol on January 6th, but there was only a handful the first day, and only two or three a day since.Number6 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2024 2:11 pm So, TFG's trial begin on Monday and it's projected to last six weeks. He's tried delaying the trial, to no avail, on a couple of occasions so he needs to do something to delay the trial. I'm thinking he's going to fake an illness to disrupt the trial and then he'll use his social media account to post campaign videos and messages.
What do you think he'll try?
He’ll pretend to be Nelson Mandela. And you guys will tell us how mistreated Dear Leader is, won’t you?Glennfs wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2024 4:33 pm When Trump gets found guilty he will probably get some form of home confinement. Which will be basically meaningless as hevwill still be able to campaign and perform the duties of a former president.
The penalty will be symbolic only. I except between thr guilty verdict and sentencing the LW social media fueled by LW talk shows will be going wild with expectations of him going to prison.
I wonder what the response will be when he doesn't.
Again proving you aren't here for an honest discussion.
Once again living in the real world putting Trump in prison would just not be a wise thing to do.
Wow, always making excuses for Dear Leader.Glennfs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 7:41 am Once again living in the real world putting Trump in prison would just not be a wise thing to do.
Had you read the link I posted you would know that.
However in the fictional novel world you live in locking up Trump would have no unintended consequences.
Again the disruption and logistics to the prison would put an undo strain on the facility. While causing a financial burden to the state prison system.
In other words it just doesn't make sense to lick him up on any level.
He would have armed guards
He would have his meals specially prepared for him.
How would that alone be done? The kitchen would have to be closed while Trump's armed guards supervised the preparation of his meals.
His laundry would have to be done under the supervision of armed guards.
As much as you desire to see him behind bars a reasonable person would realize it just isn't feasible. Not whether or not he deserves to be locked up.
There is a big difference between believing he deserves prison and the realization that ir simply won't work.