"Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Nirvana? Steve McQueen? Homer Simpson? Anna Pavlova?

Your passion is covered...Just talk about it!

Moderators: plunderer, Bernie the union guy

Post Reply
User avatar
Libertas
Board Emeritus
Posts: 18878
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:53 am

"Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by Libertas »

really

Did we talk about this?

OK

SPOILER ALERT




















TWO HOURS of boring and slow with a few spots here and there of interest then 20 minutes of QT madness that makes him the great director he is.

But so slow, my son is a huge QT fan and he said it was slow.
Excuse me while I use a BROAD BRUSH to say anyone who spends one minute defending anything rump is just as guilty as he is of all his crimes

User avatar
ProfessorX
Board Emeritus
Posts: 17614
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Location: Sunny South Florida

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ProfessorX »

So here's the deal. I haven't seen the movie, but I have heard about what's in it. Now, it's based on real Hollywood history, but is fiction set in a time period. That some are calling the "Golden Age" of Hollywood although I'm not exactly sure why.

Don't know why I should spoiler box things that I haven't actually seen and am not sure happened in the film, but I guess that as they are potential plot details ... I'll do it.
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

User avatar
ProfessorX
Board Emeritus
Posts: 17614
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Location: Sunny South Florida

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ProfessorX »

Bruce Lee’s Daughter Says Quentin Tarantino ‘Could Shut Up’ About Her Father’s Portrayal (EXCLUSIVE)
https://variety.com/2019/film/news/bruc ... 203302850/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bruce Lee’s daughter, Shannon Lee, is responding to director Quentin Tarantino’s latest comments regarding her father’s portrayal in the film “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.”

“He could shut up about it,” she told Variety when asked how Tarantino could rectify the controversy. “That would be really nice. Or he could apologize or he could say, ‘I don’t really know what Bruce Lee was like. I just wrote it for my movie. But that shouldn’t be taken as how he really was.'”

[snip][end]

Apparently, Tarantino has Lee in the film claim he could beat up Muhammad Ali. Dunno, that might be true, in the days before "MMA" I suspect boxers would not have known how to defend against somebody who knows Asian martial arts and can also use their legs, but honestly the whole thing seems to be a tempest in a teapot.

Anyway, his daughter does not like the way he is being portrayed, overall. Thing is, when confronted about how certain real life people are portrayed, QT retreats behind saying it's fiction, not a documentary.
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

User avatar
Libertas
Board Emeritus
Posts: 18878
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by Libertas »

ProfessorX » Sat Aug 17, 2019 7:16 am wrote:Bruce Lee’s Daughter Says Quentin Tarantino ‘Could Shut Up’ About Her Father’s Portrayal (EXCLUSIVE)
https://variety.com/2019/film/news/bruc ... 203302850/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bruce Lee’s daughter, Shannon Lee, is responding to director Quentin Tarantino’s latest comments regarding her father’s portrayal in the film “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.”

“He could shut up about it,” she told Variety when asked how Tarantino could rectify the controversy. “That would be really nice. Or he could apologize or he could say, ‘I don’t really know what Bruce Lee was like. I just wrote it for my movie. But that shouldn’t be taken as how he really was.'”

[snip][end]

Apparently, Tarantino has Lee in the film claim he could beat up Muhammad Ali. Dunno, that might be true, in the days before "MMA" I suspect boxers would not have known how to defend against somebody who knows Asian martial arts and can also use their legs, but honestly the whole thing seems to be a tempest in a teapot.

Anyway, his daughter does not like the way he is being portrayed, overall. Thing is, when confronted about how certain real life people are portrayed, QT retreats behind saying it's fiction, not a documentary.
When you see it this will make more sense.

Weird QT would go out of his way to portray Bruce in this way, why? QT is a sexist, this is clear in the movie.
Excuse me while I use a BROAD BRUSH to say anyone who spends one minute defending anything rump is just as guilty as he is of all his crimes

User avatar
ZoWie
Board Emeritus
Posts: 20685
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:10 pm
Location: The blue parts of the map

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ZoWie »

It's Tarantino doing a post-truth version of Hollywood, the way he does post-truth versions of everything. Even the same sicky colors. It's very personal, and it has about as much to do with the way I remember L.A. as King Kong had to do with an accurate depiction of Manhattan. If I made it, it would be psychedelic-era colors, probably shot in hand held grainy 16mm, as homage to that era of film making. There would be at least one teenage riot on Sunset Strip and more than one allusion to Day of the Locust. There'd have to be a scene with the Oscar red carpet at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

Everyone's different, though, and the thing is at least a well made personal statement by someone who got a very different pop philosophy than I did, when he was getting his formidable creative chops together.

The Golden Age of Hollywood was in the late 1930s, when all the classics got made. Critics will nearly all agree. The makers did more with huge noisy shitty equipment, in forbidding megalithic sound stages, on factory-like studio lots run by robber barons, sometimes with a fiendishly intractable color process, all on a tiny 1.33 aspect ratio screen with one sound channel, than we'll ever do with all the tech in the world.

It's still the best stuff going. They had the feature film form wired.

User avatar
ProfessorX
Board Emeritus
Posts: 17614
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Location: Sunny South Florida

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ProfessorX »

Again, without spoiling what actually happens, I will say - from what I've heard - it follows in the Tarantino trend of taking actual history, and giving it more a kind of ending he thinks it might have deserved.
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

User avatar
ZoWie
Board Emeritus
Posts: 20685
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:10 pm
Location: The blue parts of the map

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ZoWie »

That is absolutely true. He does this. There's nothing wrong with it, as long as it's not passed off as reality, which he doesn't do. "It's only a movie."

Yes I interpret his latest as a nostalgic dream of a alternative Hollywood where things worked out a lot better than they ever did in this one. That's fine. We all do the what if game. In mine, the corporations lost an anti-trust suit and couldn't buy up the studios, and we continued on in the proud tradition as film makers vs content providers. There would still be an MGM lot, and the commissary would still make dark, wonderful coffee with unlimited free refills. We would still be reading in The American Cinematographer about people making great special FX by dumping water in the Paramount parking lot. The FX themselves would put anything electronic to shame. Just like they used to. Etc.

His is probably better cinema.

User avatar
ProfessorX
Board Emeritus
Posts: 17614
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Location: Sunny South Florida

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ProfessorX »

Hey, I mean, I loved the alternative history of Inglorious Basterds, Adolf Hitler and the entire Nazi command got burned in a theatre fire. It's wish-fulfillment. It's what a lot of people besides QT sure wish would have happened. Heck, even the fictional Nazi manhunter played by Christoph Waltz gets his just desserts. Everybody kinda loves that a bunch of Brooklyn Jews got the chance to beat Nazis to death with baseball bats.

So ... again ... look ... is this really a spoiler at this point? I think it's kinda in the trailers ... I'll just say he rewrites the ending of the Manson Murders. I won't say what happens. :D

And I agree with your point. He's not saying it's a documentary, or even a dramatization, so nobody should take it as such. I guess the question Bruce Lee's daughter is asking is can you get away with both things? Saying your fictional portrayal of real people like BL isn't real, but then turning around and defending the way you portrayed them as accurate?
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

User avatar
ZoWie
Board Emeritus
Posts: 20685
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:10 pm
Location: The blue parts of the map

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ZoWie »

Right, as I said, Tarantino is something of a post-truther. Sometimes he wants it both ways. Critics give him a pass because they think it's all just too post-modern.

User avatar
Libertas
Board Emeritus
Posts: 18878
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by Libertas »

ZoWie » Mon Aug 19, 2019 10:48 am wrote:It's Tarantino doing a post-truth version of Hollywood, the way he does post-truth versions of everything. Even the same sicky colors. It's very personal, and it has about as much to do with the way I remember L.A. as King Kong had to do with an accurate depiction of Manhattan. If I made it, it would be psychedelic-era colors, probably shot in hand held grainy 16mm, as homage to that era of film making. There would be at least one teenage riot on Sunset Strip and more than one allusion to Day of the Locust. There'd have to be a scene with the Oscar red carpet at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

Everyone's different, though, and the thing is at least a well made personal statement by someone who got a very different pop philosophy than I did, when he was getting his formidable creative chops together.

The Golden Age of Hollywood was in the late 1930s, when all the classics got made. Critics will nearly all agree. The makers did more with huge noisy shitty equipment, in forbidding megalithic sound stages, on factory-like studio lots run by robber barons, sometimes with a fiendishly intractable color process, all on a tiny 1.33 aspect ratio screen with one sound channel, than we'll ever do with all the tech in the world.

It's still the best stuff going. They had the feature film form wired.
You didnt find the first 2 hours SLOW?

I kept waiting for a plot development or something. I totally get everything he was doing, I recognize everything, but it was just too slow, not informative of the plot, etc.

Now, I have a crush on Brad Pitt and will watch him in anything twice. I am not Gay but damn.

Of course Leo is amazing, so I will watch it again.
Excuse me while I use a BROAD BRUSH to say anyone who spends one minute defending anything rump is just as guilty as he is of all his crimes

User avatar
carmenjonze
Board Emeritus
Posts: 24805
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 6:24 pm

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by carmenjonze »

So I saw it yesterday with a Salvi friend who went to U$C so knows Los Angeles. I'd thought it was set in the mid-70s, not 1969.

Tarantino is one of those people for me that's a really horrid person but I like his movies. About like Woody Allen and Roman Polanski. So it was fitting for me that it was centered somewhat on Polanski.

I will give Tarantino this: guy can research the muthafkin eff out of a movie. The music was amazing. And for anybody who grew up in the LA area in the wake of the Manson Family, there are some really incredible historical references. The racism and misogyny Tarantino is infamous for wasn't exactly muted but it also wasn't as bad as it usually is. (This time instead of being directed towards African Americans it's directed at Asian Americans in the person of Bruce Lee. Tarantino is frustrating because he sets these movies in these eras in which he can justify crass, racist so-called "humor" or "realism" or "well that's just the way it was back then". In the showing I was in, not a lot of people laughed.)

It's not Inglorious Basterds, but if that's the 10 for me, I would say Once...is an 8.5.

Stop calling the cops on us.

User avatar
ProfessorX
Board Emeritus
Posts: 17614
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 6:57 pm
Location: Sunny South Florida

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by ProfessorX »

So, BTW, the two awards at the Venice Film Festival went to Joaquin Phoenix's Joker ... a controversial film which I've discussed elsewhere .... and to Roman Polanski.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/s ... ki-triumph" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Polanski's film, An Officer and a Spy, is about Alfred Dreyfus and the Dreyfus Affair in France. Whatever I think of the man, it's a film I might consider seeing at some point.

Separating art from personal conduct and political views is a question with no easy and obvious answers ... despite what some claim ... however, I do think artists are responsible for the themes they advocate in their work (like "white man's burden") and, if like Polanski, you violate the law ... well, he's managed to avoid facing the consequences for that so far by fleeing the U.S. ...

Does that mean I would never see his film? I know my stepmother refuses to see anything now that has Woody Allen in it, but I wouldn't make that same decision. And I'm increasingly convinced by Ronan Farrow's writing that Woody is, at least in his personal life, slimy. As I said, I think those are answers everybody should arrive at for themselves. I just have never agreed that bringing up the personal conduct or political views of artists is totally irrelevant to evaluating their work.

So ... yes ... that applies to Quentin Tarantino, too.
-- Tis an ill wind that blows no minds.
Malaclypse the Younger

User avatar
carmenjonze
Board Emeritus
Posts: 24805
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 6:24 pm

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by carmenjonze »

ProfessorX » Tue Sep 17, 2019 5:15 am wrote:So, BTW, the two awards at the Venice Film Festival went to Joaquin Phoenix's Joker ... a controversial film which I've discussed elsewhere .... and to Roman Polanski.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/s ... ki-triumph" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Polanski's film, An Officer and a Spy, is about Alfred Dreyfus and the Dreyfus Affair in France. Whatever I think of the man, it's a film I might consider seeing at some point.

Separating art from personal conduct and political views is a question with no easy and obvious answers ... despite what some claim ... however, I do think artists are responsible for the themes they advocate in their work (like "white man's burden") and, if like Polanski, you violate the law ... well, he's managed to avoid facing the consequences for that so far by fleeing the U.S. ...

Does that mean I would never see his film? I know my stepmother refuses to see anything now that has Woody Allen in it, but I wouldn't make that same decision. And I'm increasingly convinced by Ronan Farrow's writing that Woody is, at least in his personal life, slimy. As I said, I think those are answers everybody should arrive at for themselves. I just have never agreed that bringing up the personal conduct or political views of artists is totally irrelevant to evaluating their work.

So ... yes ... that applies to Quentin Tarantino, too.
For myself, it’s often worth it — and a lot of my colleagues with different priorities disagree with me on this — to see some of these flicks by these f’ed up people because they influence the culture we live in. Same for listening to f’ed up music lyrics or viewing art with really f’ed up themes. I think it’s important to do because if anything else, how are you going to develop a critique of men like Tarantino if you haven’t watched his stuff?

Stop calling the cops on us.

User avatar
Number6
Board Emeritus
Posts: 14770
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:06 pm

Re: "Once Upon A Time in Hollywood" sort of spoiler but not

Post by Number6 »

The movie was long and slow but it was good. Anyone who remembers that time period and what was happening then can appreciate the anticipation that was building during the movie. When I saw the movie and saw the lead character lived next door to Polanski and Sharon Tate I had a flashback to the news of the murders the Manson family committed. Then, throughout the movie the interaction with members of the Manson family I said to myself "Oh, shit!"

Tarantino did a good job of making an alternative version of Hollywood substituting his lead actor into other movies and humorously having him make Italian movies, ala Clint Eastwood, to reestablish himself as a lead actor. Like I said, it was a good movie but it's one that I would only want to see once.
When you vote Left you vote right.

Post Reply