You don’t post links. You pretend it’s all from your own mind.
You’re a dishonest wanna-be and we all have your number, you sock puppet pretender.
You don’t post links. You pretend it’s all from your own mind.
Bullshit! I copied exactly what you posted and did a Google search. The first item on the page came up with the quote, including the part saying it was from Meadow's lawyer. I seriously doubt you got a source for the statement without attributing it to Meadow's lawyer.
He likes to pretend he did all the case research and came up with it all by himself. That's why he rarely, if ever, provides a link. It's green grass pretending to be a smart guy, laughably so.Number6 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 7:18 pm Bullshit! I copied exactly what you posted and did a Google search. The first item on the page came up with the quote, including the part saying it was from Trump's lawyer. I seriously doubt you got a source for the statement without attributing it to Trump's lawyer.
I didn't challenge greengrass because he was greengrass but because what he posted just didn't see right setting off my internal warning flags. That's why I Googled what he posted and found out he erased the part saying it was from Meadow's lawyer. By doing that he changed the system from appearing to be a valid, unbiased opinion to being just a propaganda statement from Meadow's lawyer.
Yeah, this time you just caught him red-handed doing what he always does - take someone else’s (usually conservative propaganda) work, file the serial numbers off, and pretend it’s his own profound education and intelligence.Number6 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 7:36 pm I didn't challenge greengrass because he was greengrass but because what he posted just didn't see right setting off my internal warning flags. That's why I Googled what he posted and found out he erased the part saying it was from Meadow's lawyer. By doing that he changed the system from appearing to be a valid, unbiased opinion to being just a propaganda statement from Meadow's lawyer.
Federal courts are not kangaroo courts ran by politicians looking to further their career.gounion wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:11 pm Meadows bid to move his case to federal court just got shot down.
Look for Glenn and Green Grass to tell us how horrible it is that this fucking left-wing judge ignored the law and is just going after poor innocent Mark Meadows.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/08/politics ... index.html
Rudy was your hero, and that's all he was about - getting rich and famous. Guess it's different when the prosecutors are black women.Glennfs wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:22 pm Federal courts are not kangaroo courts ran by politicians looking to further their career.
Guilty or innocent Trump had zero chance in Manhattan and zero chance in Fulton County Georgia.
Our Federal courts are a different story and the special prosecutor isn't looking to get rich or famous.
Silence from the right!gounion wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:11 pm Meadows bid to move his case to federal court just got shot down.
Look for Glenn and Green Grass to tell us how horrible it is that this fucking left-wing judge ignored the law and is just going after poor innocent Mark Meadows.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/08/politics ... index.html
Rudy was a great mayor. Probably the best mayor of NY City in.our lifetime. After thar he has been an abject failure.
Look at what a shithole NYC after decades of democratic party rule and what a shithole it is again today after decades of democratic party rule.
No he didn't. He was a crook. He was just the only person on 9/11 that would do his job - the President decided to crawl under a rock when the nation needed leadership.
Two questions you won't answergounion wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:42 pm No he didn't. He was a crook. He was just the only person on 9/11 that would do his job - the President decided to crawl under a rock when the nation needed leadership.
But hey, he cracked down on black people with his stop and frisk that was ruled unconstitutional, so you liked that, right?
Rudy had a VERY corrupt police department, and his orders were found to violate the Constitution. I don't call that good.
Yes it was as that black man was far less likely to be a victim if crime.
No, stop and frisk didn't care if you were committing a crime, they treated you like a criminal anyway.
An internal‐strategy report (the “Rudolph W. Giuliani Vulnerability Study”) prepared for the candidate’s 1993 mayoral campaign devoted more than 50 pages to the 1992 police riot under the all‐caps heading “RACIST.”
“When dealing with direct questions about the police rally, Giuliani should acknowledge and criticize the underlying racial nature of the protest,” the study urged.
Giuliani never condemned the overt racism of the 1992 NYPD riot. Instead, he ordered the vulnerability study destroyed, but a copy was leaked to journalist Wayne Barrett in 2000.
Giuliani won the 1993 election against Dinkins and won re‐election in 1997. During his two terms, the NYPD ran roughshod over the civil liberties of all New Yorkers, particularly in neighborhoods where most young men of color grew up under the thumb of constant police harassment. At the heart of Giuliani’s law enforcement policy, in case after case, was a lack of accountability for police misconduct.
Now, Giuliani is back again to give us his sage advice. Jangling his chains like Marley’s Ghost, he reminds us of everything that is wrong about the NYPD’s past policing practices. But unlike Marley, Giuliani has no remorse for his past misdeeds and wants us to repeat them into the future. There is nothing that the onetime presidential candidate can tell us about proper policing that is worth listening to.
So how’s that policy working out for NYC. Last time I checked the current mayor is telling folks the strain is destroying the city. So New Yorkers are getting what they voted for.ProfX wrote: ↑Sat Sep 09, 2023 7:55 am The story of Rudy's "heroism" on 9/11 is a bit of a fiction. They talk about how he was in the streets with the people shortly after the attacks on the towers.
Yeah, because he had put his city's terrorism response center/bunker in WTC 7, a decision that had been widely criticized even before 9/11, and as we all know, it collapsed. He would have gone there to plan and manage the response, but it had been destroyed.
BTW, a couple things about him as Mayor worth mentioning. I could mention problems with civil liberties, and race relations, and ... but I'll point out this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayoralty ... y_Giuliani
As Mayor of New York City, Giuliani encouraged hardworking illegal immigrants to move to New York City.[35] He said in 1994:
Some of the hardest-working and most productive people in this city are undocumented aliens. If you come here and you work hard and you happen to be in an undocumented status, you're one of the people who we want in this city. You're somebody that we want to protect, and we want you to get out from under what is often a life of being like a fugitive, which is really unfair."[35]
In a Minneapolis speech two years later he defended his policy: "There are times when undocumented immigrants must have a substantial degree of protection."[36] In 2000, Giuliani said of New York City, "Immigration is a very positive force for the City of New York. Immigration is the key to the city's success. Both historically and to this very day."[37]
Giuliani also expressed doubt that the federal government can completely stop illegal immigration.[38] Giuliani said that the Immigration and Naturalization Service "do nothing with those names but terrorize people." In 1996 he said that the new anti-illegal immigration law, as well as the Welfare Reform Act, were "inherently unfair."[39] In 1996, Giuliani said, "I believe the anti-immigration movement in America is one of our most serious public problems."[37] In the same year he said, "We're never, ever going to be able to totally control immigration in a country that is as large as ours." He went on to say, "If you were to totally control immigration into the United States, you might very well destroy the economy of the United States, because you'd have to inspect everything and everyone in every way possible.
[snip][end]
Open borders scumbag.
Or maybe showing a kind of honesty the party wants to suppress in the Trump era.
The right will never change. They'll continue with their racist demonizing and wish to use violence just like the Klan a century ago. It's all the same old song for them.ZoWie wrote: ↑Sat Sep 09, 2023 12:19 pm 1. The Mexican border is a long one, yes. It's not really from coast to coast, but from the Gulf coast to the blue Pacific shore, and that's still a far piece. Drumpf's wall went up fast, and looks it. It's kind of a joke, really, more symbolic than anything. Even on a symbolic level, it resembles East Germany's similar effort a little too much for comfort. That didn't work all that well either, now pieces of it are in museums.
2. The gang problem is a form of free trade. Republicans don't want you to know that. Gang activity worldwide has many causes, but it's facilitated somewhat by the market for illegal drugs. Since the activity is already a crime, it's not surprising that organized crime does it, same way they used to run sports betting.
3. The idea that the USA can keep everyone else out and remain a free country is utter balderdash. It has never worked in several millennia of well documented history, of which the whole existence of the USA is an eye blink. Nothing basic has changed in this entire time, even though it has never, ever worked. It leads to abuses, yes, as witness the entire history of New York. NYC is the poster child for 19th century immigration laws or the lack thereof, for better and for worse.
4. The current poster child for immigration laws is Los Angeles, and it proves mostly that where's a will there's a way. We spend millions keeping them out, and still they come, pretty much at will. They tunnel in, they pile into overloaded trucks, they swim in from boats, and when they get caught and sent back they learn from the experience and get it right the next time. Nothing keeps them out. It's stupid to keep throwing money at a failed policy instead of doing a searching and somewhat embarrassing re-conceptualization of the entire issue.
5. It has become clear from every known fact that the only solutions are global ones. The US cannot fix a broken planet with laws that only apply inside its borders.