Correct you only support and agree with scotus decisions that support your political beliefs. Because you are always correct and scotus is only correct when they agree with you.gounion wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 9:38 am That is what Trump is saying he has. A license to do whatever he wants, even before and after his term. That's his assertion. Glenn wants me to say that I agree with the Supreme Court if they side with Trump and give him what he wants. I do not.
Again, since you're so slow, I have to say once again that I do not think the Court will do so. But I'm betting it won't be a 9-0 decision.
Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
So if they give Trump complete and total immunity, you will agree with the Court - correct?
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
They are not going to make it legal for Trump to be able to assasinate the democratic members of the House and Senate as you claim.
What you in your hatred of Trump and your Trump Derangement Syndrome have no ability to realize,think or consider is the ruling is as much about future presidents as it is about Trump.
But, since you believe that Trump and the republican party wants to kill democrats and imprison people like you it is hard to have a conversation with rational thought.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
I’m not saying they are. What I am saying is that’s what Trump is asking for. You demand that I accept whatever they decide.Glennfs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:48 am They are not going to make it legal for Trump to be able to assasinate the democratic members of the House and Senate as you claim.
What you in your hatred of Trump and your Trump Derangement Syndrome have no ability to realize,think or consider is the ruling is as much about future presidents as it is about Trump.
But, since you believe that Trump and the republican party wants to kill democrats and imprison people like you it is hard to have a conversation with rational thought.
If they give Trump full immunity as he’s asking for, will you support that decision? Yes or no?
And it’s Trump that is pledging to imprison his opponents.
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
gounion wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:54 am I’m not saying they are. What I am saying is that’s what Trump is asking for. You demand that I accept whatever they decide.
If they give Trump full immunity as he’s asking for, will you support that decision? Yes or no?
And it’s Trump that is pledging to imprison his opponents.
Yes I support the legal and constitutional scholars on our scotus to make the correct decision for our country and its future. No matter what that decision is.
Not your bizzaro claims about what they rule will mean.
You are obviously getting your information from some very odd choices. If you believe that if scotus rules in favor of Trump that it will give hom the power to murder democrats and imprison his political opponents.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
I read Trump’s brief, and what he’s asking for. He’s saying he’s immune from any actions, even before and after when he was President.Glennfs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:36 am Yes I support the legal and constitutional scholars on our scotus to make the correct decision for our country and its future. No matter what that decision is.
Not your bizzaro claims about what they rule will mean.
You are obviously getting your information from some very odd choices. If you believe that if scotus rules in favor of Trump that it will give hom the power to murder democrats and imprison his political opponents.
And yes, if they give Trump all he’s asking for, that’s EXACTLY what it means.
And you say you’ll be fine if that’s what they rule.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
No. Not really. I don’t need to read Trumps brief to understand this isn’t about a license to kill. If it’s in there and since you are so familiar with the brief and the law and the constitution, perhaps you will link to the exact language where Trumps legal team is asking for a license to kill.
I stand by my previous post.
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Again Trump is saying he's completely immune from ANY actions he might have or will take before, during and after his Presidency.JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:51 pm No. Not really. I don’t need to read Trumps brief to understand this isn’t about a license to kill. If it’s in there and since you are so familiar with the brief and the law and the constitution, perhaps you will link to the exact language where Trumps legal team is asking for a license to kill.
I stand by my previous post.
But hey, you think Trump walks on water, so you think that he didn't do that. I don't have the time or crayons to explain it to you. You'd deny it anyway, since you don't like facts.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
You are waaay more impressed by what you THINK Trump want than I. I don’t really give a shit. He is appealing a specific case on specific charges. I don’t think a license to kill is part of that at all. You may. But that’s your problem. The court will decide the issue based on the case and the law. What your brother from another mother wants will have little to do with it.gounion wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:56 pm Again Trump is saying he's completely immune from ANY actions he might have or will take before, during and after his Presidency.
But hey, you think Trump walks on water, so you think that he didn't do that. I don't have the time or crayons to explain it to you. You'd deny it anyway, since you don't like facts.
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Again, you haven't read it, and won't read it, so you don't know. You won't read it because you don't want facts.JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:03 pm You are waaay more impressed by what you THINK Trump want than I. I don’t really give a shit. He is appealing a specific case on specific charges. I don’t think a license to kill is part of that at all. You may. But that’s your problem. The court will decide the issue based on the case and the law. What your brother from another mother wants will have little to do with it.
You will pretend Dear Leader did nothing wrong.
Remember he's the one that said he could shoot someone on 5th ave and nothing would be done.
You're the Trump sycophantic here. You're always here to defend him.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
I pretend nothing. I just am not as obsessed with the wants and needs of your “deal leader”.gounion wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:31 pm Again, you haven't read it, and won't read it, so you don't know. You won't read it because you don't want facts.
You will pretend Dear Leader did nothing wrong.
Remember he's the one that said he could shoot someone on 5th ave and nothing would be done.
You're the Trump sycophantic here. You're always here to defend him.
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
You’re projecting again. You’ll do anything to defend Trump, just like you’re doing here.JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 4:10 pm I pretend nothing. I just am not as obsessed with the wants and needs of your “deal leader”.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
No. Not really. Nobody mentions the name Trump more than you. Nobody calls him “dear leader” other than you. I’ll bet he’s the first thing on your mind every morning. You talk about him throughout the day and you dream of him at night. The only person you think about more is yourself. I doubt his name would come up half as much on this site were it not for you. He’s your obsession. You should work that shit out in therapy.
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Oh? If he's MY obsession, why is he going to be the nominee of the Republican Party, and why does he have more support from our nation's conservatives than anyone else?JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 4:35 pm No. Not really. Nobody mentions the name Trump more than you. Nobody calls him “dear leader” other than you. I’ll bet he’s the first thing on your mind every morning. You talk about him throughout the day and you dream of him at night. The only person you think about more is yourself. I doubt his name would come up half as much on this site were it not for you. He’s your obsession. You should work that shit out in therapy.
You just want to ignore, shall we say, the elephant in the room.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
You should ask somebody who plans to support him. I am not such a person. I don’t ignore the elephant in the room. I’m just not as pathologically obsessed with the elephant. I don’t have elephant derangement syndrome. See a doctor will ya? Before you are tooo far gone.
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Yes you are ignoring that Trump will be the nominee for President, and that you want Trump to defeat Biden.JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:45 pm You should ask somebody who plans to support him. I am not such a person. I don’t ignore the elephant in the room. I’m just not as pathologically obsessed with the elephant. I don’t have elephant derangement syndrome. See a doctor will ya? Before you are tooo far gone.
It’s that simple.
And fuck off. Until you show me a doctorate, stop trying to pretend to be one, ya dick.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Well you seem to think you can read minds. You want to tell everyone who they support and what they think. So you fuck off. Show me a doctorate or fuck off.
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
I don’t pretend to be a medical professional. You’re so delusional you think you are. Not surprised. Go back to your crayons.JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:48 pm Well you seem to think you can read minds. You want to tell everyone who they support and what they think. So you fuck off. Show me a doctorate or fuck off.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Judge blocks Trump lawyers from arguing about columnist's rape claim at upcoming defamation trial
NEW YORK (AP) — A judge late Saturday said former President Donald Trump’s lawyers can't present legal arguments to a jury assessing damages at a defamation trial on a jury's conclusion last year that he didn’t rape a columnist in the mid-1990s.
U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan made the determination in an order in advance of a Jan. 16 trial to determine defamation damages against Trump after a jury concluded Trump sexually abused columnist E. Jean Carroll but did not find evidence was sufficient to conclude that he raped her.
https://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news ... 594306.php
NEW YORK (AP) — A judge late Saturday said former President Donald Trump’s lawyers can't present legal arguments to a jury assessing damages at a defamation trial on a jury's conclusion last year that he didn’t rape a columnist in the mid-1990s.
U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan made the determination in an order in advance of a Jan. 16 trial to determine defamation damages against Trump after a jury concluded Trump sexually abused columnist E. Jean Carroll but did not find evidence was sufficient to conclude that he raped her.
https://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news ... 594306.php
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
...and look in the mirror. You're projecting. It's fine for YOU to do it, eh?JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:54 pm You aren’t anymore qualified to diagnose delusion than I am. And yet here you are. Pretending to be something you clearly aren’t.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
Yeah, you got nothing. We all know.
-
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:39 pm
Re: Theory - Trump Immunity Case
FU.
Two can play childish games. You've never been able to debate anyone and saying random letters is all you have left.