No you just aren't that bright. Taking a look at Trump's defense is not an endorsement of that defense or defending Trump.gounion wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 12:06 pm Again, you always come to Trump's defense. Even after you praise the investigation. But that was all bullshit, and we both know it.
What is Trump's defense? Well, he's perfect, he's never done anything wrong, and it's just people out to get this poor victim.
Let's remember, he's already said he's never met her and she's horse-faced. None of this ever happened.
Same as his defense for everything. He's perfectly innocent.
So go ahead and defend this bullshit. Because he's your guy.
Having a rational discussion about merits or lack thereof of that defense would require a certain degree of open-mindedness. Something else you lack.
Of course if the lackey who delivered the payment broke the law then the person making the payment also broke the law.
Had you read the link, especially with the ability you claim to have in regards to being able to understand legal documents. You would have seen that there were statutes mentioned.
But, no matter you simply do not have the mental ability to discuss anything that requires you to look beyond your limited beliefs.