Glennfs wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 10:50 pm
Typical I just got done driving 8 hours.
Bullshit excuse. It was a throw-away answer you hoped I would accept without challenging you.
I found the speeches to be far less political than I expected.
Thompson and Cheney laid out a factual road map of what happened. Neither were partisan.
I had to listen to the videos and they were exactly what you would expect from an award winning TV producer.
This makes no sense because it was a televised hearing and if it's "what you would expect from an award winning TV producer" that would mean more of a visual medium than an audio medium so how could you tell it's "what you would expect from an award winning TV producer" if you only heard it and not seen it?
The evidence was pretty much what we already knew but, it was nice to hear and it was very damming for Trump.
What we, the public, didn't know before, is what Barr said and what Ivanka Trump said about TFG said about election fraud because it confirms Trump knew there was no election fraud.
But, I doubt we will see any criminal referrals made by the committee against trump. Not because trump is innocent. But because it would probably hurt the democratic party at the polls.
The committee still has at least 10 hours of televised hearings and any evidence they gather from those hearings plus the evidence they already have can be turned over to Garland with recommendations to prosecute. Whether Garland prosecutes isn't known but I seriously doubt Garland is going to be concerned whether prosecuting Trump will help or hurt Democrats at the polls because he hasn't politicized the Justice Department like Trump and Barr did.
Now if public opinion turns harshly against trump and for him being charged then we will see a criminal referral
It is pretty obvious that they surely have enough on him to be able to refer charges.
See the paragraph above about what Garland will or will not do.
When you vote left, you vote right.